|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.56.69.254
In Reply to: RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A posted by the old school on May 15, 2012 at 21:42:30
Old School -Sound is subjective, that was the point of my posts.
The IVA was made with upgraded parts, does it sound better(?), does it sound different, yes, do they command a higher resale value, yes! Stereophile did reviews on both, I suggest the OP try to read both if he cannot have a "blind test" auditioning both side by side.
Re; "If you think every new incarnation of a product is superior to the older one, you are a fool." - Nope I don't, but in John Dunlavy's case I would suspect knowing the guy like I did, he did believe it was.
Edits: 05/16/12Follow Ups:
My IVs Signatures are for sale here. Stereophile has reviews of both. As usual, you must have a good system to hear what difference(s) exist. I recall that the tweeters woofers and therefore the crossover was changed but the woofer made what difference was perceptible. There is very little difference in the speakers because the design is the same and they differ only in (essentially trivial) detail that made a very small difference.
Yes, this is my point: there is very little difference between the SCIV and the SCIVa I prefer the SCIV OVER the supposedly improved SCIVa, but the difference is extremely small.
differences in reflections of various rooms.
We'll have to agree to disagree about global warming until the next global cooling scare comes along
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: