|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.15.255.9
In Reply to: RE: Not good enough. posted by carcass93 on November 11, 2010 at 12:31:25
Done it many times with many systems and cables. If the cables are decent, biwiring makes no difference. Therefore, IMHO, it is pointless to bi-wire.Now, you probably will be surprised to find out that I do bi-wire. My reasons are that (1) I have many, many cables, (2) there is no down-side and (3) it precludes some carping from others. ;-)
Kal
Edits: 11/11/10Follow Ups:
the speakers are truly designed for bi-wiring (Vandersteen) or just provide two sets of input lugs. There are speakers that benefit and those that don't I would never use a blanket statement such as yours Kal.
"Man is the only animal that blushes - or needs to" Mark Twain
it is dangerous to make generalizations but, until I find an exception, my hypothesis is intact.
BTW, the only issue about whether a speaker is "designed for bi-wiring" is whether the filters for the LF and the HF are completely independent, including the grounds. Some of the ones I have used fit that description.
Kal
Reading this mini-thread just after reading Tony Lauck's speech on the Digital Asylum on how dacs that reveal differences in transports are flawed, I am faced with either ignoring what I hear or what I read.
No reason to ignore either. If you just ignore your own observations, you run the risk of being consistently unhappy. If you just ignore what you read, you run the risk of being mislead by your perceptions. I believe you have to understand and assess what you read to inform your perceptions but that you have to have the fortitude to reject/temper either after due consideration.
Kal
I was going for a laugh here.
LOL.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: