 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
209.157.148.112
In Reply to: Theft is theft. posted by markrohr on March 22, 2007 at 12:28:40:
Music was never meant to be copyrighted, - or restricted...The "law" was designed to stop massive redistribution, - not a few one-off copies.
It has been "proven" that sharing of music leads to greater sales.
How can it be theft if one receives more because of sharing?
Your analogy's are completely off base.
The problem of leisure, what to do for pleasure. Ideal love a new purchase, a market of the senses. Dream of the perfect life.
Follow Ups:
.
Look,I speak from the experience of having been signed with a record label, and have more than a few friends with major label deals; you've lost focus with this argument when you talk about what stealing is, and what fair use is, and where the benefit lies.
Step up, research, have fun. Read Courtney Love's Salon article regarding the biggest fear of a signed musician and a musician's revenue that is "stolen" constantly by their own label(s).
Fair use means publicity and enhanced sales.
The problem of leisure, what to do for pleasure. Ideal love a new purchase, a market of the senses. Dream of the perfect life.
Is that better?Why are you so persistent in continuing to inflame the discussion? If you know better, and you are on the correct side of the discussion, then why is it necessary to do this?
Of course, it is fair to mention that there also IS such a thing as LEGAL file-sharing as well.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
