|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
145.64.134.245
In Reply to: RE: I have full acess to JASA, and I'd like to read that paper/letter, so... posted by geoffkait on September 10, 2013 at 12:21:13
“As you know I did provide solid scientific explanations for how they worked - eight years ago!”
As you know I had contacted Altewischer himself, and he and his colleagues were laughing back then and must still be laughing.
Altewischer, Nature, 2002: “Experimental realization of quantum entanglement is relatively easy for photons; a starting photon can spontaneously split into a pair of entangled photons inside a nonlinear crystal.”
This using a 240 mW krypton-ion laser beam of 406.7 nm wavelength, which isn’t exactly the wavelength of a CD laser! And a photon being split in two isn't exactly the same as two photons encountering each other on a random basis!
A solid scientific explanation? In your book maybe, not in mine. Get your explanation published in a peer-reviewed physics journal, or in Nature, or in Science, then, and only then you may call it solid.
So I'd say, no, mainstream audio industry professionals are no more ready today for such gadgets than they were 10 years ago, and for good reasons.
Klaus
Follow Ups:
Nice to see nothing has changed. No surprise here.Of course the important thing is if milk squirted out of Altewischer's nose when he laughed.
Mainstream professionals? Now there's a group in need of a serious makeover. :-)
"Just what makes that little old ant / Think he'll move that rubber tree plant / Anyone knows an ant, can't / Move a rubber tree plant / But he's got high hopes..."
Edits: 09/13/13
"Mainstream professionals? Now there's a group in need of a serious makeover. :-)"With or without the smiley, you've dismissed the scientific community in several of your posts. Yet, you have completely failed to offer even a single shred of evidence to justify doing so.
What exactly is it that disqualifies people like Hilliard, Lansing, Heyser, Toole, Small, Thiele, Linkwitz, Curl, Beranek, Otala, and many others from earning your respect for their work?
For some inexplicable reason, you cling to some notion that the scientific community is misguided, yet you offer no coherent explanation as to why, nor do you offer any evidence that your so-called "solutions" do anything other than to affect the psychological disposition of the buyer and to line your wallet with money from unsuspecting and gullible customers. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Edits: 09/13/13 09/13/13
You forgot the pseudo skeptics' favorite admonition::"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
The inmates are restless.
Smiley face
Edits: 09/13/13
"You forgot the pseudo skeptics' favorite admonition::"
Actually, I didn't forget anything, Geoff Kait of Machina Dynamica.com, except to mention Geoff Kait and Machina Dynamica.com.
I wrote exactly what I intended to write.
And of all the opportunities you've had to state your case for your machina dynamica "products", Mr. Geoff Kait, and dismissing the audio & acoustical professions, you still fail to offer even one coherent thought which backs up any of your assertions.
I'd be happy to reply to anything you say of substance. Until then, Geoff Kait of Machina Dynamica, you have no, none, zero, credibility, and, as I wrote in a previous post, you should be ashamed.
I couldn't possibly respond with less substance than that. Mainstream professionals everywhere must be getting a little nervous.Have you considered taking a nice cold shower?
Edits: 09/13/13
I guess you figure that would make you equals.
Your oh-so snarky comeback is now awaited. 1, 2, 3, ...
How could I possibly out snark the old snarkmeister?
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: