 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.154.179.230
In Reply to: Don't hold breath your breath SEJ. posted by Dan Banquer on June 25, 2006 at 07:22:38:
Provided of course we use my system, in my room of which I am intimately familiar. I am willing to prove I can hear the differences I claim to! I live in Orlando, Fl and I don't expect anyone to come here for the sole purpose of conducting this test. But should any of you Objectivists be coming to DisneyLand, Universal or Seaworld anyway, why not stop in and be unplesantly surprised when I prove my claims?See Dan once again you're incorrect. Although I am one of THESE GUYS who tends to be very vocal in my criticisms, I do NOT do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable. I just cannot get one of YOU GUYS to take me up on my offer to provide the proof you require, yet definitely don't want to believe can be provided!
Thetubeguy1954
Follow Ups:
because there is not one single repeatable specification in your post. Typical audiophile BS.
d.b.
Dan, you are almost a joke, but like Pink Floyd said, but you're really a cry.I guess you haven't got the intelligence to fiqure my post out so I'll explain it real simple. I'll submit to whatever Objectivist DBT BS "you guys" require, provided we use my system in my room of which I am intimately familar!
Anything else is just pure Objectivist BS designed to make one fail. You are the epitome of Objectivistic behavior, first you outright lie by stating "These guys tend to be very vocal in the criticisms, but do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable." Then when caught in your lie, like I did when I said I'd submit to your tests using my equipment you pretend that supports your lie by stating "there is not one single repeatable specification in your post. Typical audiophile BS."
Liar liar liar liar liar Liar liar liar liar liar Liar liar liar liar liar Liar liar liar liar liar Liar liar liar liar liar Liar liar liar liar liar Liar liar liar liar liar....
Thetubeguy1954
I am interested in you putting up the engineering spec's that you require for what you think is a good system. Now put up or shut up.
d.b.
More Objectivist BS. Although I've told you many times in the past I'm NOT technically inclined you are attempting to bully me with technical information you require i.e. "...I am interested in you putting up the engineering spec's that you require for what you think is a good system." You always do this when confronted by less technically inclined persons. You are only proving your the Bully I've accused you of being in the past!My system is so much better than just a good system. It consists of a Mastersound Reference 845, integrated SET. The source is a BlueNote Stibbert CDP. The speakers use my Aliante Pinafarina Ones for lows and partial midrange, and this crosses over to very large wooden horns using pre-1990 TAD 2001 compression drivers that have been fully restored & modified by Paul Butterfield (who also restored and modded TADs for Nelson Pass, Tom Danley & Dr Bruce Edgar to name just a few) to cover the reamining spectrum of music.
But I digress because as in typical Objectivist fashion you are trying to change the original topic once caught in your lie, the lie being your statement of "These guys tend to be very vocal in the criticisms, but do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable." (This can be verified by clicking on the link below) To your lie I answered:
"...I am one of THESE GUYS who tends to be very vocal in my criticisms, I do NOT do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable. I just cannot get one of YOU GUYS to take me up on my offer to provide the proof you require, yet definitely don't want to believe can be provided!"
Now you claim you don't want something verifiable, & repeatable. Now in a rather in a pathetic attempt to appear correct after being caught in your lie you are now claiming you are "...interested in (my) putting up the engineering spec's that (I) require for what (I) think is a good system."
This has NOTHING to do with what you originally said. Please explain how my putting up the engineering spec's that (I) require for what (I) think is a good system, has ANYTHING to do with your original statement of: These guys tend to be very vocal in the criticisms, but do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable?
The ONLY thing your new statement about engineering spec's does is represents nicely the typical Objectivist behavior of always needing to be right, even if it means discarding your original statement completely and changing the topic in order to do so.
You are so pathetic Dan, you cannot stick to your original statement when someone accepts the challenge you claim makes people like me run! We need to add a new topic to Debunking Tools. I think we should call this new debunking tool, "The Banquer" The Banquer is when the poster changes the topic of thier original post to a completely different subject for ANY reason! Or as Dan did to: a) ignore the acceptance of his implied challenge or b) just to appear correct.
You told me to put up or shut up Dan, but I'd tell you to be ready to defend your beliefs as originally stated or don't put them in print where you lies and deceptive tactics can be so easily verified. Because when I did "put up" and accept your implied challenge the only one who ran WAS YOU!
Thetubeguy1954
Not one spec listed for frequency response, distortion, noise, input/output impedance, grounding, etc.etc. Just more insults. I am wasting my time here. Get a life.
d.b.
, that iswhen your implied challenge is accepted! Did you forget that you lied when you said: These guys tend to be very vocal in the criticisms, but do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable? Did you further forget that I said I'd submit to something verifiable, & repeatable as long as it was done in my home with my system?So what in GOD's name does that have to do with my providing you with one spec listed for frequency response, distortion, noise, input/output impedance, grounding, etc? etc?
If you consider my telling the TRUTH to be "Just more insults" (because you did lie) then yes you are just wasting my time here. You really do need to stop pulling "Banquers" and get a life, "IF" you are going to completely change the topic and run when your lies are exposed and your implied challenges are accepted!
Thetubeguy1954
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
