Propeller Head Plaza

• And one week later - bjh 05:34:26 04/19/06 (1)
  In Reply to: Re: Why is there a burden of proof ? nt posted by Pat D on April 17, 2006 at 13:10:20:

  Pat revisits to plant one of his infamous Black&White isms , specifically in this case:

  Where there is a claim, it follows immediately that there is a burden of proof.

  Good for you Pat, good for you ... never give up the battle.

  LOL

  
  
  

  ---

  • Re: And one week later - Pat D 13:50:54 04/20/06 (0)
    In Reply to: And one week later posted by bjh on April 19, 2006 at 05:34:26:

    Well, one does avoid having a burden of proof if one makes no claims.

    However, it does not logically follow from that every claim made requires a burden of proof, so you have made a logical error there. For example, where something is commonly known.
    ____________________________________________________________
    "Nature loves to hide."
    ---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
    
    

    ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---