|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
122.174.42.157
In Reply to: RE: BATCH FILES UPDATE... posted by GStew on October 08, 2011 at 10:09:30
The toughest part was getting to add the various paths to the filename to be deleted. DOS is pretty cranky. It would not accept an extra Space as a character as well. Thats why my efforts of modifying the batches via Excel were wasted. Most of the commands Like 'PATH' & 'IF NOT ELSE', are very critical with their Syntax. I wasted a real lot of time trying to use Excel for this... Try using TextPad. Its way better. U need to download it..
SO i went ahead & manually added an ENTIRE set of files to EVERY single path which may have housed those files.. A pain really. But it worked well...
I intend to finish Steps 1 to 7 in the next 3 to 4 days max, God willing..
I take this opportunity to congratulate & thank u for all the work u have done in improvizing the cMP project. I have copied all my Linear PSU designs from ur posts. Worked very well...
Regards,
Junaid..
Follow Ups:
Great idea about the steps 1- 9! Also thought about this but as always the time are missing out on all. Propose those files that you and I have proposed to remove as separate steps too, for example, in the form of steps 3.5 and 4.5. It would be cool to take account of all the files to delete proposed by the other users.
Thanks again for your work.
Serge.
http://cmp2-mihaylov.narod.ru/
My cMP2: Windows XP SP2, Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H, Intel Core i3-530, Corsair CM3X160C9DHX 1GB, system drive - Transcend IDE FLASH MODULE TS2GDOM40V-S, ESI Juli@, full linear PSU, NAS - WD My Book Live, iPad
Edits: 10/08/11
Yes. That's exactly how I was able to maintain USB thumb drive functionality even after part 16... Also, xplite changes things quite a bit. I felt that the performance suffered a downside after the xplite stage, then re-gained a better balance at step 9 ( just a bit better, but still step 5 was the winner), & again kept on varying erratically all the way till part 16. Now I'm back to step 5 again & carefully observing where we missed out on what. Batch files makes this process a piece of cake. But I want to spend some time auditioning each step & pinning down ONLY those files that are eligible to be removed, I mean only those which are CPU INTENSIVE..
This way, one can maintain a perfect blend of Sonics along with ease of use. I haven't started on the remaining batches yet, as I'm exhausted with writing batch processes yesterday. I intend to start over tomorrow. As I'm writing this, I'm listening to step 5 again. I am quite certain that I will be skipping the Xplite step altogether. My initial impressions were right. Let me know what Ur findings are....Junaid...
Edits: 10/09/11 10/09/11
I went up to #7 and didn't quite like it so I am back at #5. I am now at #5 post XPLite.
I thought I had lost the natural attack, decay, sustain, and release of each notes in the music.
When time permits I would like to try from #8 to #16 and see how that fare.
Thanks for all works you had done and let's know your findings.
Best Regards
U wrote "I went up to #7 and didn't quite like it so I am back at #5. I am now at #5 post XPLite."
Xplite comes after steppe 5. U mean u have gone one step before xplite right???
Im glad I have taken a backup of every single step before proceeding with another. So now I'm able to comfortably run steppe 5 which I liked. Post steppe 5 (after xplite ), I found the spectrum tilting one side or the other with every new set of deletions ( my assumption ). It never sounded good in one band without a downside at the other. The highs opened up at the cost of midbass dropping a notch. The bass became full at the cost of the upper mids getting laid-back more than they should. So I intend to start over from steppe 5 & proceed carefully. May be our findings are subjective as well. But this reminds me of a statement I heard once..."We build our systems to suit our tastes, not to satisfy the critics"..
Junaid
Yes, I just completed XPLite removal of components.
You could be right in your assumptions. I thought some steps favoured a certain frequencies over others too.
More listening required to ascertain these. Hope to find the time to do so.
Best Regards
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: