|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
31.153.119.105
In Reply to: RE: Objectively same posted by Ugly on May 01, 2017 at 11:26:34
As compared to measurements using proper high resolution instruments and or sound cards, with proper analysis software.
If you understand measurement principles, you would not have asked this question. And if you must, compare these to Stereophile and HiFi News measurements and my 64 bit Pro FFT software and high quality ADCs.
Follow Ups:
"If you understand measurement principles, you would not have asked this question."
Either that or if you for once in your life posted some evidence with your claims that indicate you actually have some basis for making the claim....lol
Which FFT software and ADC's. Are you willing to share any screen captures which demonstrate this superiority?
I'm still very skeptical you can exceed the resolution of Archimagos posted results with your software and gear and will remain so until you demonstrate otherwise. This all based on your history of BS claims with no evidence or substance to back any of it. Until you post screen shots of your results I'm assuming they are just too embarrassing for you to reveal.
Anyone who understands measurements in electronics will know what I have been on about.
This is why Stereophile would not dream of using amateur software and hardware to make the case for no difference as claimed.
I don't have to and don't want to explain anything to you. If the originator of the comment wants to respond, that's fine.
all the dancing you do to try and pretend that literally everything you post isn't complete BS might lead one to question that....
He will never elaborate as he prefers to post within the confined boundaries of his knowledge.... which is evident in his often unintelligible vagueness.
Proper=Right or Wrong. In measurement, the instruments and techniques being used must be an order of magnitude or more better than the object being measured.
This is what you and some others are not able to fathom and regard as vague.
Here is where you've once again almost certainly posted all the evidence necessary in order to reveal you are definitely full of it. Unless you have been to Windows X place and listened to the system in question, exactly how would you know how much capture resolution would be necessary in order to resolve an audibly resolvable difference in that particular case?
How many times have you heard the system in person, fmak, which Windows X made the determination about the new driver? how many times have you heard it before and after the driver update?
I'm going with zero, and you just made all this BS up here on the spot as usual.
I commend you for being a bit more specific, this time.
No more specific than pointing out your inability to understand what other posters are saying.
I have no problem understanding what other posters are saying because they usually make sense..... unlike most of your posts. But thanks for trying harder this time.
A post only makes sense to those who possess the background and knowledge to comprehend. In your case, your posts clearly demonstrate that you do not possess the capability of making sense of others' posts.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: