|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
206.255.198.169
In Reply to: RE: Too deliberatly obtuse posted by fmak on January 04, 2017 at 06:55:10
Clearly you are unable to explain the rationale behind your arcane registry edit suggestions. And still don't understand that my server doesn't do any audio processing - thus (at least for all the rest of us), realize there is no need for any such changes in my environment. Which is why I don't use a general purpose computer for playback in the main system.
Then you complain that I haven't laid out any basis for increasing the CPU's scheduling priority for the two LMS tasks! Time to look in the mirror. :)
Just hilarious.
Follow Ups:
care what your servers do. You did not explain your setup and responded obtusely to my post on something else.
Unless you can explain rationlly how your system is optimised and why it is optimal, you are just posting nonsense. Playing FLAC by itself is not optimal except for hardline ITrists.
You did not explain your setup
Try this, fmak. Click the "A" beside my name. Then follow to my system details. Just like everyone else does to find system details.
Unless you can explain rationlly how your system is optimised and why it is optimal, you are just posting nonsense.
Apparently, you don't understand operating systems. Understood.
Playing FLAC by itself is not optimal
According to exactly whom? Not that you will actually provide any substantiation for that assertion. You are incapable of explaining anything you'd posted. Naturally, none of us expect that you will answer any of the questions I've asked of you.
Clueless and surly.
decoding flac to memory so the whole track is available is optimal, then playback can be event driven with no extra processing.
If decoding flac during playback then there will need to be extra processes to do the decoding, extra buffers to hold the flac data and decoded data, data alignment issues between the decoded buffer and player buffer, checks to see if more data is required to be decoded etc
If it makes no difference then it's not an issue either way.
http://mqnplayer.blogspot.co.uk/
Latency-free delivery of a WAV file to the microRendu player.
Edits: 01/06/17
and it has no claim to being 'optimised' as you tried to assert.
I have been talking orange. If you want to talk Apple, this is your business.
According to exactly whom? [regarding FLAC]
Can you understand simple questions?
Do you know how to formulate an answer?
What is the basis of your belief?
Do you ever answer questions posed to you?
Is anyone home?
These are nonsensical questions. Just tell us why your system is 'optimised'.
but cannot force him to read - or understand and retain what he's already read.
Others here, however, experience no difficulty. :)
a falsehood seems to be the order of your posts, no assertions that have no basis.
I understand perfectly what E-Stat was talking about. You seem to have a comprehension issue, but we all knew that. ;-)
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: