 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
75.215.207.182
In Reply to: Naxos recordings are sonically a mixed bag; Any way to guess which releases don't have treble glare posted by Nieustevea@msn.com on March 13, 2007 at 10:21:14:
No label, in my recollections, makes digital recordings that I think are constantly superior to the norm. For there are still too many uncertainties in regard to what makes a good recording.
Follow Ups:
I'm pretty sure Telarc, Reference Recordings and Chesky would not necessarily agree (nor, perhaps, would fans of these labels).
Just like high-end gear.... Most of it isn't much better than the mainstream stuff....
...whether you're being serious or not. One COULD make a case that you don't need to go "all the way to the stratosphere" to get fantastic sound (which would mirror the audiophile label dismissal -- for example, I've got a few Naxos recordings that are SOTA (Alsop Barber). OTOH, a label like Reference Recordings is special -- almost in a catagory by itself -- and I wouldn't dismiss the idea that some labels DO get it right most of the time, and more often than others.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
