![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
I have revised my feelings as thus: Ones I like the most, and are satisfactory at least to me: Ozawa/BSO (good balance, taut, Japan DG avail now with high shipping costs to USA), Levine/Chicago (very energetic, less good balance, taut, BMG out of print), Jochum (mono, great brass, flexible rhythms, Berlin PO DG Originals), Jochum EMI (energetic less taut than Berlin IMO). Like Less (sound not quite up to modern: Cantelli Testament) This update as of 3/15/04. Thanks. Bill
I posted this early last year:Hello,
Several weeks ago I asked people about this. I listened to all my CD's and they either sound too aniemic, bad sound, or not incisive (too much legato).I bought the Jochum/DG set recently, and yes that is satisfactory, and my favorite so far. Incisive, energetic, not legato (Karajan). Even better than the Furtwangler 1951 because of the improved sound. Toscanini is not bad either. The runners up were- Klemperer, Bohm VPO, Kertesz/VPO, and Karajan 1978.
I will list the ones I heard in addition to above: Wand NDRSO, Chicago, Bohm BPO 1961 (not bad), Giuini LAPO (not bad) and VPO (too slow), Karajan BPO 1964, Sanderling/Dresden BMG, Dohnanyi/Cleveland, Solti/CSO, Boult, Muti/Philadelphia (not enough energy, but good balance) , Abbado/BPO (not taut), and Bernstein/VPO.
I have not heard Cantelli/Philharmonia but plan to by end of May.
Thanks for your recommendations.
Follow Ups:
What about Solti/CSO ? That's easily my favorite version
![]()
Thanks for your inputs. The reason I re-visit this is that I find that this seems to me a very hard symphony to perform well, but it is a favorite of mine. Plus my opinion changes sometimes, and I like to hear your opinions. Most performances I have heard do not excite me, just not energetic enough. When they are, sometimes the balance is not to my liking (too much emphisis on strings). I have not heard some of the above, (Dorati, Van Beinem) I have Furwangler DG 1951?, and Tarha 1951 NDSR Furwangler (great). I was concentrating on stereo ones for my examples. My favorite mono version of the ones I have heard is Jochum BPO with Furwangler Tarha (1951) not quite as good sound. I can't argue with Toscanini especially the remastered RCA. I sold my 1990 RCA version and bought the remastered 1999 version (2 fer).Regarding Szell, yes its good but not up to the others I have mentioned (in my opinion). I have it.
I would like to hear the Van Beinum (I have his Bruckner 5,7,8,9 on Philips Dutch Masters). I have too many versions already. But I like it.
Nidermyer van Schlector conducted a definitive performance in 1904 on wax with the Southeast Wesphalia Philharmonic. Of course it's lost but nothing else can compete so don't bother. If it's not very olde, hard to find, and on some primitive medium, it's gotta be a loser. Like old ballplayers, old tymes, old English, etc. Sorry.
![]()
The real sleeper Brahms One is Christoph von Dohnanyi and the Cleveland Orchestra, on Teldec CD.
![]()
The relatively newly released Toscanini set (recorded in London in the mid 50s by Legge) on Testament (?) is definitely worth a listen. The set is of the four Brahms symphonies.
![]()
Nice, sonically refurbished reissue on Sony, originally on Columbia. Really fine, gripping performance with sound which is quite well balanced.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
![]()
my first exposure to the Brahms Symphonies was the B.Walter Columbia recordings. I still have not heard recordings that satisfy me as much as those performances did.
![]()
I think my first experience was Ormandy, but it's Walter these days.
![]()
Walter's recordings of the 2nd and 3rd symphonies are also wonderful and there is the 4th is very fine, too, though for the 4th I prefer Fritz Reiner and the Royal Philharmonic, reissued on Chesky.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
![]()
I reach back further for the great ones.Mengelberg
Scherchen
Celibedache, Milan
Furtwaengler, 1952 (live concert)
Also:
Toscanini, Philharmonia (except first mvt)
van Beinum
Krauss
Try any two of those to see what I mean.
Clark, referring to the EvB, I'm assuming you mean the '51 Decca (nicely refurbished on King Super Analogue LP - no hum, no pitch sagging). I'll second that, and also add the Mercury Kubelik/Chicago.
![]()
I love it that you keep revisiting this! It's been fun reading your periodic updates, and they've prompted me to revisit (and sometime re-evaluate) some of my Brahms 1 favorites.A couple thoughts: your list has most of big faves--Jochum, Toscanini, Klemperer--but there are a couple really good ones I know of that you don't mention. Have you heard Szell? I imagine you must have, since it's so easy to find, so I'll assume that one wasn't to your tastes. How about Levine? That's another good 'un, though I don't know if it's out on CD. Also, re Toscanini, have you heard the earlier recordings? Or just the '50s RCA? There's a 1940 version on Naxos that's very good, more flexible in tempo than the rather hard-driven (but still marvellous!) RCA.
![]()
As has been pointed out to me before (:-), actually reading the words on the page is the KEY to comprehending written communication!
![]()
nt
![]()
I think these are both quite fine and might suit your tastes.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: