Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
68.46.23.175
In Reply to: RE: The older Magnepans also used a butterworth alignment for the mid to bass portion of the crossover. posted by Davey on November 28, 2021 at 18:09:00
The MGIIIa manual suggests a butterworth alignment for the bass section when using an active crossover.There really is not a completely butterworth crossover, used in audio.
Edits: 12/03/21 12/03/21 12/03/21Follow Ups:
You're tap dancing backwards now. As I said earlier, "it's debatable whether those are Butterworth acoustic alignments."
I'm well aware of how these crossovers work and how to construct active equivalents or variations of them.
Here's an example of 3.6 prototypes I built (still in use BTW)....and contributed to this forum over twenty years ago. :)
http://www.integracoustics.com/MUG/MUG/tweaks/davey/mg3.6xo.htm
Next time you comment on my posts, have your shit together.
Dave.
It is debatable whether your solution is better than the stock crossover!
My solution IS the stock crossover. Curves are identical.
Did you even read the page?????
And, it's only one, possible, solution. I'm not saying it's the best solution. Line-level crossovers allow much more versatility in implementation and other improvements.
Dave.
"stock" is the same and not a solution to a non existent problem!
A crossover design is more than "curves".
What makes your solution better?
Maybe one of the other fellas can school you on the basic concept.
You have all the appearances of a troll. I can't be bothered further.
Dave.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: