Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
68.37.34.203
In Reply to: RE: Naturally, I'd choose... posted by E-Stat on November 09, 2021 at 05:39:57
I can believe that. My 20.7 do similar. No particular area sounds all that different. I was especially sensitive this when I first got them walking around the room or out of the room
Follow Ups:
Tall line source + nearly perfect dispersion thanks to the narrow ribbon -- pretty much the only thing that will change in a major way are the crossover lobes!
Tall line source + nearly perfect dispersion thanks to the narrow ribbon...
I've heard both the 20.1 and 3.7 at Sea Cliff using similar electronics. While the 20.1 clearly had better first octave response, I found the 3.7 the more coherent.
You can pick apart the frequency ranges in the 20.1.
Yep, same thing with the 20.7 -- the speakers have become more coherent. I think the quasi ribbons make a difference -- they're cleaner and sound more like the ribbon. And I think the gentler crossovers make a difference as well, since the change is gradual.
The 30.7 is the most coherent of all -- they added a midbass coupler because they found that the bass panels muddied the sound of the midrange, and the new high quality midrange is amazing -- it measures like a tweeter and for all the size of the 30.7, for me, it's the midrange that stands out.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: