Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
68.34.97.50
In Reply to: RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website posted by triamp on September 25, 2020 at 03:52:42
I also follow the Audio Science Review website. They pursue a finely crafted objective analysis of equipment. And objective is where their approach runs into problems.
For example, I own a Topping D50s DAC that tested excellent on their scale and is strongly recommended. Closely comparing it to my other DAC, which is a bit more expensive, the sound is thin, shallow and much less detailed.
Pure measurement does not present the whole story in audio.
Follow Ups:
This.
They rate a lot of stuff well that sounds like crap, thin and ughhhhh.
SINAD is not the end all, be all.
Yes Tubes add noise, and this noise is simply beautiful as one example.
> > For example, I own a Topping D50s DAC that tested excellent on their scale and is strongly recommended. Closely comparing it to my other DAC, which is a bit more expensive, the sound is thin, shallow and much less detailed. < <
Did you do your listening tests of the D50 in a controlled, double-blind experiment?
Science doesn't care what you believe.
"pure measurement does not present the whole story in audio"
Where have I heard that before.............?
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: