Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
136.1.1.105
In Reply to: RE: Very Nice posted by Michael Samra on May 31, 2017 at 04:07:42
Michael...
Did you like the CLX better than the 20.7s? Or was it a good deal? I find the 20.7 to have a better lower-mid than the logan ... My opinion of course.... I have had logans for about 13 years or so.....
Also,from my demo of the 20s - I just don't know if I would need additional bass.... room dependent for sure ... but getting ready to pull the trigger on some 20s....
Follow Ups:
Timm
I got my CLXs from the insurance when a small water pipe ruptured in my basement and sprayed my old Monolth 2s. It didn't touch my two ML Descent subs but anyway,I got the CLXs because I like ESLS and I was already setup for them.I could have got the 20.7s for much less however,the store wrote all the stuff up and they were ML dealers plus I ended up with a nice chunk of change having replacement cost.
You are right and the bass is better on the 20.7s.I use the subs so I'm good but I would love the 20.7s as well.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" H. L. Mencken
Oh nice!! My stuff is going in the basement soon. I have no idea what my insurance would cover or if there is a limit on electronics etc. I would have got the CLX too!! :)
I ended up getting 48k with CLXs total.I got the CLXs at 20% off so they were a little over 20k and they didn't want old Monoliths or the IMF SACMs so I fixed them as only the midrange cabinet on one got wet. I had a pair of AR3s that were completly destroyed tho and they gave me 1800 for those.
I never had a claim in the 30 years I have been with them.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" H. L. Mencken
That's what I call makin lemonade!!!
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: