Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
219.92.52.249
In Reply to: RE: Another First Reflection Trap (FRT) Adventure : Quasi-Ambiophonics posted by 55135 on March 04, 2017 at 06:42:20
>>Also am I correct that the greatest effect of the XTC is at about 1 kHz? In which case maybe I should optimize the distance for the midrange units -- will try it again using that as a parameter. Meanwhile, I ordered a copy of AmbiophonicDSP to play with.
I forgot to address this point earlier. The barriers will do the isolation from above 1000Hz. However, the separation gradually declines from 1000Hz to 400Hz. it was mentioned in the many AES papers that you will find on the website.
Just a word of caution here. Ideally, the main speakers should be line array type. So it is possible that you are right.
I hope you get your AmbiophonicsDSP working well. Please note that the values would change if the sampling rate of the source changes. Initially, it would be tter to experiment with big ensemble classical music and only then move to other genres. The "zentrum" should be set around 2 to 3dB. With convolution speakers, I set the "space" to zero. However, your mileage may vary and set them according to your taste for non convolution approach.
And lastly, here is the link which was made earlier with 8 convolution speakers.
It is difficult to evaluate the sample as my stereo and Ambio with 12 speakers were recorded with binaural microphone and meant to be heard with headphones. The original file is inserted between for you to compare all three versions.I could have done better with the stereo recordings but it wasn't easy to move the speakers. :)
Follow Ups:
"Just a word of caution here. Ideally, the main speakers should be line array type. So it is possible that you are right."
I think I may have made a mistake by using the central axis as a guideline. At 3 kHz, a wavelength is only about 4", so relative phase loses significance. There would still be an intensity difference that in theory needs crosstalk cancellation, but I don't think it can really be done effectively at that frequency since even a 2" head shift will change the effect from cancellation to reinforcement. So I plan to try again with the midrange as the baseline, and also with the software although I'm currently building a new HTPC so it will be a few days before I can try that.
Wow, huge difference in the sample! I'm just listening on cheap earbuds now, I'll head upstairs at some point tomorrow and find my Etymotics. But it's obvious even with the cheap earbuds. No wonder you're enthusiastic. How have you positioned the convolution speakers?
"How have you positioned the convolution speakers?"
It is recommended by Ralph that the rear half of the side wall to be given priority and followed by the rear and front half.The recommendation was based on numerous research.
Since I am limited to only one IR, I placed mine at 90 to 130 degrees, covering the rear half. I use St.Cecilia concert hall's IR for 45 degrees. With my current speakers arrangement this yields a better integration over the 60 degrees IR. Over this weekend, I will be trying 90 degrees IR and see if it improves further.
While the proper way is to use all 25 IR of St.Cecilia or any other IR by placing the speakers at the actual measured location, I opted to recreate my own "wall" due to space and lack of technical knowledge for pro sound implementation.
It is addictive as playing around with the convolution creates the very best listening experience. The method works for stereo setup too.
Thanks, I was reading up on inexpensive speakers. It looks like there are some decent ones though hard to know what would work. But man, once you add all those DAC racks and amplification it wouldn't be cheap! Also, I'm not sure how I'd feed the DAW with my usual source, JRiver -- haven't looked into it but I wonder whether you'd need to run two machines.
OTOH, no reason I can't do what you did and try a simpler setup. I have some Monsoon computer speakers and I could use the motherboard audio to experiment, with the impulse response in JRiver . . .
Josh,You need not spend a fortune on the small speakers. Mine are a mix of Yamaha, Panasonics and Sony. Speakers the size of a CD (see picture). The role of the convolution speakers is to act as sound bouncing off the wall and therefore the quality, in a small room, doesnt matter. Moreover, the I use JRiver's PEQ to cut all frequencies below 200Hz and above 4500Hz.
Basically, you only need one amplifier. I was driving 4 speakers with one amplifier. Now, I am driving all 22 speakers with just 3 amplifiers. You can drive all speakers with one 100Watt Amp or better still get a Behringer or Crown to drive all the speakers as the output volume is very low.
I am using the http://www.gearbest.com/speakers/pp_39924.html amp to drive the other 8 speakers. You would probably need less than 10 Watt for all the speakers. You can see the diagram in my profile page. My total budget for all the speakers and amplifiers is below US$200 as the HT speakers were bought used.
ST
Edits: 03/07/17
Wow, at that price, you can't afford not too!
I'm definitely going to try this once I get my new HTPC up -- I have the box built, but the monitor I was planning to get is backordered so right now I'm scrambling for a substitute.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: