- Posted by Todd R (A) on September 22, 2001 at 14:10:03
In Reply to: nope, it was for bi-wiring posted by Mart on September 22, 2001 at 07:28:30:
>for single wiring we don't have twin Zobels in parallel. So, we >don't split the Zobel in twain. So, half the resistance & double >the capacitance (except the RF disc cap).Ok, Like this for single wire? Just want to make sure.
0----- 4ohm -----+----- 0.94mfd -----+-----0
| |
+----- 0.01mfd -----+Or...
0-----+----- 4ohm ----- 0.94mfd -----+-----0
| |
+---------- 0.01 mfd ----------+
Untitled Document
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
[
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
- you have to use <PRE>plot</PRE> - Mart 14:50:13 09/22/01
(1)
- In Reply to: Like this Mart? posted by Todd R on September 22, 2001 at 14:10:03:
> for single wiring we don't have twin Zobels in parallel. So, we > don't split the Zobel in twain. So, half the resistance & double > the capacitance (except the RF disc cap).
Ok, Like this for single wire? Just want to make sure.
0----- 4ohm -----+----- 0.94mfd -----+-----0
| |
+----- 0.01mfd -----+Or...
0-----+----- 4ohm ----- 0.94mfd -----+-----0
| |
+---------- 0.01 mfd ----------+
Yes, you got the idea. However, keep in mind anything between 0.9mfd and 1.0mfd is fine, because 0.94mfd is bitch to find unless you wire two 0.47mfd in parallel.
