|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
172.56.241.189
In Reply to: RE: Not when you consider... posted by tweaker456 on May 22, 2023 at 14:57:00
Do something different or continue on the same path?Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome....
And what did I say that was wrong? You may not like it, and I don't either, but the government is a horribly inefficient way to allocate scare resources.....like Money....which contrary to governemt behavior, does not grow on trees....
Too much is never enough
Edits: 05/22/23Follow Ups:
It is pretty clear from this chart that the USA was doomed in 1986 when this chart clearly shows an impending catastrophe. Doomed I tell you!
Speak out, you got to speak out against the madness
You got to speak your mind, if you dare - David Crosby
If doomed we are to be, I doubt it's gonna be ONE thing, but a perfect storm of greed and stupidity.
Maybe the government should consider limiting itself to those things clearly called out in the Constitution?
While the other 'things' are reserved to the states or respectively the People.....
The 9th and 10th amendments are not 'recommendations', they are in the Bill Of Rights and theoretically need to be taken seriously....
The legal Convolutions done to acrcue yet more power to the Federal Government makes me ill.....
And some of it, perhaps, can be laid at the feet of Hamilton...
did you know it was ILLEGAL for a farmer to grow grain on his own farm for his own internal use...like livestock feeding and for seed? Yep.
Too much is never enough
Yeah, let's go back to hangers and hangings.
Speak out, you got to speak out against the madness
You got to speak your mind, if you dare - David Crosby
The Constitution is the Final Arbiter of what is legal, right and wrong. If you do not follow that, you've got a form of 2-party mob rule......
9th and 10th amendments clearly calls out Federal Limits. No amount of twisting the language will make some of the stuff they do constitutional.
Having the various states maybe not agree, is a wonderful way to find easiest or best ways to accomplish some things.
To maybe give a non-partisan example? How do Executive Orders have the force of law for anything but the executive branch? President IS after all, the 'Chief Executive'.....which is only 1 of 3 branches. I support his running his branch. But the LAW part of the executive is a Congressiona function followed by any court cases and eventually, in some cases, as far as the Supreme Court.
An executive order which effectively changes the written law, IMO should not be enforceable....
Too much is never enough
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: