|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
148.87.23.11
In Reply to: RE: Auto sales are slowing, and upheaval is next - CNN posted by AbeCollins on May 16, 2017 at 18:15:34
And then the bicycle. I know, I still have a long wait ahead of me that I may not make it through.
Follow Ups:
Rail has a basic problem: it depends upon extremely expensive infrastructure that only has one use. The cost of track build-out (including design, right-of-way acquisition, hard construction and maintenance), plus equipment costs (those trains cost millions), plus staffing costs (God help you if they're public employees in California), is too great to amortize across the limited pool of users. It's well documented that rail fare payers won't pay enough to cover those costs. And at this juncture, there don't appear to be enough alternate users to take up the rest of the burden: fiber optic cable companies have gone ahead with other rights of way, and other modes of transportation are incompatible with sharing rail rights of way.
As a case study, I refer you to the Baltimore area light rail system, which was built on existing rail rights of way (thus saving tons of money) in the densest commuting corridor in the region (thus positioning itself for the most viable stream of fare payers), and it still can't cover costs. See, for example, the Baltimore Sun article at the link. Key quote: "Light rail cost roughly $36 million to operate in 2015. In the 2016 state fiscal year, fares paid by passengers covered only about 18 percent of operating costs."
Happy listening,
Jim
"The passage of my life is measured out in shirts."
- Brian Eno
Maybe possible in some parts, but not here in Kelowna BC. Starting a couple years back our entire city track system was removed, finally paving where all the tracks crossed the roads within the last year. Tracks will not be making a comeback here.
They turned from DT to the end of town into a bike, jogging, walking path.
he US should have, in the 1950s when they decided to build the US freeway system, to also make a complimentary rail system, independent of the railroads of the time.
So rail passenger transport would be fully compatible with the freeway system and just as thorough.
Every major freeway would have included dual passenger rail tracks..
If they had any brains, they would be planning such in the future for ALL freeway upgrades.
Such tracks owned by the DOT and not some railroad company.
.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: