|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
47.188.98.98
In Reply to: RE: 1:35 / 3:36 A Time Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 by Isao Hashimoto posted by pictureguy on April 16, 2017 at 18:33:44
I was at CERN in Geneva last summer, home of the LHC (Large Hadron Collider), Atlas, ALICE, and numerous exploratory experiments.The physicists who talked to our group seemed to know what they're doing, and study minute details of sub-atomic particle behavior.
Given their work, compared to T456's complete lack of evidence regarding demagnetizing tobacco (while still being "quite certain"), I have to think that T456 is full of shit, at least until he can give us a reason to think otherwise.
Edit: Ya know, maybe T456 is just goofin' with ya and doesn't believe any of the stuff in his posts. I mean, seriously, isn't "sign wave" a dead give-away?
:)
Edits: 04/17/17 04/17/17Follow Ups:
'Evidence' of ET presented in next post by #456.
consists mainly of 2 hours of anecdotal evidence. Fun Video, though.
For most persons to come around to believing ET is here, they'd have to see a very high standard of evidence. I'd say 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. Maybe even a body. Or wreckage we can't amke here.
#456 is so much smarter than everyone lese, we should simply take his word for 'it'.
Too much is never enough
Multiple eye witnesses with radar corroboration is not good enough? Is radar anacdotal? My word for it? Are you kidding me? Astronaut after astronaut after astronaut saying they see or have seen ET craft, risking their reputation after qualifying for their profession and risking their lives in one if not the most dangerous job there is ain't good enough? Over 500 testimonials in the Disclosure Project, many military officers and intelligence people. Well PG, I suggest you go through life blindfolded since you think eyesight is of so little use. No need for you to see, no need for you to listen. Def dumb and blind. Of what use are the senses in observing reality anyhow. Right?
"The Borg is the ultimate user. They're unlike any threat your Federation has ever faced."
- Q, 2365
Edits: 04/17/17
And don't forget Project Blue Book.
Hundreds of unexplained sightings and many that were explained but in such a ludicrous manner as to be laughable.
Now? What holes in modern physics permit such travel? THAT'S the real problem.
The FIRST book I ever bought, when I was in 6th grade?
'Flying Saucers Have Landed'. Desmond Leslie and George Adamski (early contactee)
Too much is never enough
I still want to see his evidence for being "quite certain" about demagnetizing tobacco leaves. THEN, it might be interesting to move on to another topic.:)
Edits: 04/17/17
I'm thinking #456 was just havin his version of fun with my lack of unconditional belief in demagetizing CDs.
Too much is never enough
Once again PG you spew anti intellectual non sense. It's not, as you state ,me making fun of your lack of unconditional belief in demagnetizing cd's. NOTHING could be further from the truth. Why oh why would I expect or even want anyone to believe in almost anything unconditionally. You will not try it to see for yourself if it is of sonic benefit because you can't see a priori any cause. One again, there are many things you believe in that you can't see a cause for, like existence it'self... When you were a little boy and pointed to a bird and said daddy daddy why does a bird fly, you could see the bird fly before you knew why. I myself still don't know the ultimate cause of birds flying. Believing I think someone should unconditionally believe and believing I was serious about demagnetizing tobacco could be construed as a form of brain damage. It's this kind of brain damage I was put on earth for to debunk. The cause of my existence.
Warm regards,T456
"The Borg is the ultimate user. They're unlike any threat your Federation has ever faced."
- Q, 2365
I find it a real sign of the times that asking for a cause and effect realtionship is now 'spewing antiintellectual nonsense'.
That was at one time called the Scientific Method.
The sequence of events would be something like 'Hey! I noticed something I can't account for'.
Maybe the change in sound of a CD?
The question 'why?' than becomes the drive behind finding the Cause.
Investigations are done. Theory proposed and modeled. You know, METHOD?
Now, with the low level of proof now proposed, it is time for a real investigation as to WHY some persons note the effect. Find a cause.
I was no more serious about Drain Bamage than you about demagnetizing Tobacco. Yet you felt compelled to note my 'misspelling'!
Let's say proof were presented of Aliens in our Solar System. A base on one of the moons of Jupiter? Or a moon of Mars? Big flashing sign on OUR moon. Doesn't matter.
The REAL question than becomes HOW did they get here. My opinion is that they would Lie Low and try to be minimally intrusive. Steven Hawkings is wary of Alien Contact. And for good reason. Humans are very primitive, tribal creatures. We'd likely as not, go into somekind of meltdown situation or conflict of some sort. We simply are NOT ready for such contact.
As for existence? I don't believe in it. We (what we call 'reality') are really a simulation running in a Really Big Uber Super Computer.
Too much is never enough
" I find it a real sign of the times that asking for a cause and effect relationship is now 'spewing anti-intellectual nonsense'." It does seem we speak a completely different language. It's not asking for a cause and effect relationship that is anti intellectual nonsense, it's asking for it before you are willing to believe something or anything, and in some cases without easily obtained first hand experience. Like man, do you really think that I am so stupid as to think looking for cause and effect is not a valid pursuit?
"The Borg is the ultimate user. They're unlike any threat your Federation has ever faced."
- Q, 2365
To be perfectly honest, I don't know.
You do not always act like you believe in cause and effect.
Nobody completely stupid or rational could write a reasonable sentence, like you do.
Human belief systems are not always rational. Like VooDoo or maybe thinking that Harry Potter books are really Historical Fiction. Or maybe 'I'm from the government and are here to help'.
Have you heard something you consider 'real' in every sense of the word? Doubtless.
Consider other reasons for so thinking. They are available to the inquiring mind.
We are at an Impasse. I ask 'why should this happen?' I'd like a plausible theory dealing with magnetic effects in non and Paramagnetic materials. And than toss in the interaction with the macro phenom of reading bumps on such a rotating disc.
I don't think that's TOO much to ask.
Too much is never enough
Well, ya could just try it and see if it improves the sound for you. Oh, I've said that before. I guess we are at an impasse.I apologize PG for not providing you with a perfect world. If I had made it easy wouldn't you find it too boring? Nighty night and sleep tight. Look under your pillow when you wake up. The creator has a master plan, peace and happiness throughout the land.
"The Borg is the ultimate user. They're unlike any threat your Federation has ever faced."
- Q, 2365
Edits: 04/19/17
I find it a real sign of the times that asking for a cause and effect realtionship is now 'spewing antiintellectual nonsense'.
That was at one time called the Scientific Method.
The sequence of events would be something like 'Hey! I noticed something I can't account for'.
Maybe the change in sound of a CD?
The question 'why?' than becomes the drive behind finding the Cause.
Investigations are done. Theory proposed and modeled. You know, METHOD?
Now, with the low level of proof now proposed, it is time for a real investigation as to WHY some persons note the effect. Find a cause.
I was no more serious about Drain Bamage than you about demagnetizing Tobacco. Yet you felt compelled to note my 'misspelling'!
Let's say proof were presented of Aliens in our Solar System. A base on one of the moons of Jupiter? Or a moon of Mars? Big flashing sign on OUR moon. Doesn't matter.
The REAL question than becomes HOW did they get here. My opinion is that they would Lie Low and try to be minimally intrusive. Steven Hawkings is wary of Alien Contact. And for good reason. Humans are very primitive, tribal creatures. We'd likely as not, go into somekind of meltdown situation or conflict of some sort. We simply are NOT ready for such contact.
Too much is never enough
Yeah, I read that post. I think he's just goofin' with ya. It's just as likely that these decades-old video interviews are professional thoughts about the inaccuracies of the "space travel aspects" of the Star Trek series/movies/Battlestar Galactica/Star Wars/etc. science fiction stuff. ("Dr. Smith, what did you think about the scene where the object...") There is ZERO evidence (not to be confused with "overwhelming evidence") that they're talking about real events, not to forget that, of all these supposed events, the pretend documentary doesn't provide even ONE snippet of actual data or video.
Reminds of the books and "documentaries" about UFOs from back in the 50's and 60's!
Oh, hey, did you happen to see the episode of the TV show "Frasier" when they had John Glenn on? That was hilarious!
:)
I just got done watching 'Mountain Monsters'.
Man, who'd a thunk we had stuff like that running around Appalachia?
Too much is never enough
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: