 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.95.212.9
In Reply to: posted by on December , at :
d
Follow Ups:
You find the proof in the same place as where you find the proof that it worked.
You find the proof in the same place as where you find the proof that it worked.
And you'll find that bit of fallacy in the trash, filed under appeal to ignorance .
se
nt
I haven't seen any proof one way or the other.se
And that's all I was saying.
And that's all I was saying.
Ah, ok. It seemed at first blush that you were saying that the proof that it did nothing stemmed from the lack of proof that it did something, rather than saying there was no proof either way.
Thanks. My bad.
se
"Similarly, the burden of proof is usually on a person making a new or improbable claim, and the presumption may be that such a claim is false. For instance, suppose that I claim that I was taken by flying saucer to another planet, but when challenged I can supply no evidence of this unusual trip. It would not be an Appeal to Ignorance for you to reason that, since there is no evidence that I visited another planet, therefore I probably didn't do so."Welcome to planet Machina Dynamica.
s
x
where can we find proof that it did something???????????You have to prove that it does or did something !!!!!!!!!!
not vice versa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
...Pearls Before Sw*ne.clark
...isn't the statement "The Tice Clock did nothing" in itself a testable claim that the claimant must prove before stating it? At least they have to prove it around here! Hell, I don't even say that oranges are different from apples around here unless I've tested it 6 ways from sunday.Gotta be careful throwing those claims around! :)
x
I'm comin' to get you all by myself.Where do you live?
If you don't tell me, I'll just ask around and find out who audio salesmen think is their most gullible customer in America.
That would be you.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
...is that any reason to get personal? "...their most gullible customer in America. That would be you."Guess it is, if one lacks even the slightest basis on which to rest his case, when one is disposed to be defensive about it.
clark
Any audibility claim Clark agrees with = needs no proofProof of audibility is never needed for subjective auditions.
If any objective audibility tests are done, they are never good enough ... unless Clark likes the results = then their methodology is "perfect"!
You're bias is showing.
,
,
,
,
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
Where do I find proof of any doubt expressed in any of your posts about the "everything makes a difference" wacko theory of audio, where no claim is ever too bizarre, and no claim is ever questioned?I don't.
.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
