|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.186.230.3
In Reply to: RE: Ping tomservo regarding US patent US4845759A posted by Rafaro on January 10, 2023 at 09:32:58
I'm not speaking for Tom, but what you describe isn't a point source, it's a line source.
Follow Ups:
Hello Bill you are right but refer to Tom's patent for clarification. When sound sources are within 3 wavelengths distance of their maximal frequency they act as a point source and may have more output than the sum of their individual outputs together. Tom measures everything! Just wondering if it would apply in this case.
Rafaro
They don't have more output than the sum of their individual outputs. Where a source is more than three wavelengths in dimension it operates in the near field, so the SPL reduction with doubling of distance is 3dB, rather than 6dB, subject to the distance to the listener. That can appear as multiple combined sources having higher output than the sum of the individual outputs if you're not aware of the difference between near field and far field, which is explained in Jim Griffin's line array white paper.
Yes Bill but the sources in this design are Within the three wavelength max freq and horns uniting as they do may fullfill the criteria of Tom's patent. Just curious as to his opinion on this. The augmentation of SPL in Tom's patent and nearfield only 3dB per distance loss seems related to constructive interference of a more planar wave exit pattern. As far as Griffin's paper line arrays for home use been there done that. It has limited usefulness mainly limiting ceiling floor reflections. That is good but side reflections are still a major problem requiring room acoustic treatment. Having done professional recording mixing and mastering showed me the importance of room acoustic treatment...well worth the money! For home use the nearfield only 3dB per distance loss is irrelevant as opposed to live sound where it is very useful. The different arrival times intrinsic to long column arrays (necessary for nearfield critical distance) blurs the mid high freq resolution. The solution is a limited number of highly efficient horn line array cabs avoiding the long lines of inefficient direct radiation cabs. I notice you have designed similar DIY versions yourself!
Rafaro
Hi
There is a way to make a horn that is very narrow in the vertical and wide in the horizontal as described above.
The way that is used is aimed over the front row, in fact if one chooses the right radiation angle down angle and height, one can make the spl near constant over a large area. The old thumb rule was "Aim at the back row", it's more scientific now but the same concept.
People talk about it have cylindrical radiation and so half the spl change vs distance compared to a point source.
So let's imagine a simple array of say 32 small sources. Each one has a frequency below which the baffle governs the radiation angle and up high, the radiation pattern will become narrow and complex as the radiator becomes "large" acoustically.
To be clear, for two sources to combine into a single new source. If you were to invert one of them, they largely cancel each other out), they have to be less than 1/4 wavelength apart for this coherent addition. There is a transition to two separate radiations by the time they are 1/2 wl apart (and radiate a figure 8 pattern, inverting one, changes the direction of the lobes)
Two equal but opposite sounds cancel each other but in phase, they add.
When your in front of the imaginary array what you get depends where you are, the vector sum of the sound from each of those sources and because they are all different distances, they don't "add" in the normal sense like close coupled subwoofers do they add and cancel depending on the frequency, angle and distances (a polar pattern of lobes and nulls, an interference pattern).
So lets say your far away from this source and it is X SPL, next to it is a point source producing the same SPL at X distance. As you walk closer, the point source increases in loudness following the inverse square law but as you get closer to the line, the more spread out in time a single sound event is and less addition of the sources there is. If you look at the envelope time curve, you can see that an impulsive event is stretched out according to the span off arrivals in time from the different sources.
In the critical listening sense, a true floor to ceiling line is impressive, the image is "a tall wall" So is the mono phantom like D Krall instead of standing in front of you.
If you remove the things the loudspeaker produces that give it an identify-able location in space with your eyes closed, it also will more disappear in the stereo image. That can produce a very powerful stereo image where your not aware of the loudspeakers if done at the right scale also for an audience.
So as the large line increases less rapidly as you get closer and closer to this requires a large sale of amplifiers and loudspeakers, the solution i came up with for work is a large full range constant directivity horn.
Skip all the self cancellation and time smear, use horn loading for efficiency and pattern control and often one box replaces a large array and sounds better.
The problems with large rooms is a greater challenge than the home or studio sized rooms and like large rooms, horizontal directivity is your friend keeping the direct sound where it belongs and lets you keep the speakers as wide apart as desired.
Tom
Thanks Tom the 2-3 wavelength limit in your patent threw me off. My approach to large scale sound reproduction was to use very efficient exponential horns in a "line array". But because of the efficiency just needing a very limited number of cabs (4) to equal the output of a long line of direct radiator cabs. Thus avoiding many of the problems you mentioned. Critical was to maintain a limited vertical exit angle not only in the HF but also in the MR. The design idea was for one person to be able to carry and set up the sound system. The benefits of such a system are obvious limited amps personnel trucks etc. So although it is not the ideal point source its close and and offers a practical alternative. The necessity of the idea came from playing bass in a band and in addition was dumped the job of setting up the sound system. Either way it appears dinosaurs (horns) are making a come back Jaja.
Rafaro
Edits: 01/29/23
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: