|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
166.137.14.109
In Reply to: RE: Hmmm.....got L-pads in mine.... posted by drlowmu on January 09, 2017 at 18:29:50
Actually, with an Lpad one wiper is in series and one in parallel with driver. Presents what appears to be a constant upstream impedance. Fixed resistors might be the easiest soln but stepped using decent switch is attractive too.
Edits: 01/10/17Follow Ups:
I switched to fixed resistors for two reasons:1: I did not like what they did to the sound.
2: To achieve the attenuation I needed, the L-pad needed to be set between 1 and 2 (on a scale of 0-10), making it difficult to match L and R settings.I determined the amount of attenuation needed by using a sound level meter, measuring the difference between wide open and what I liked. I also took AC voltage measurements at the driver, and converted that to dB's.(the results were amazingly close).
Edits: 01/10/17
The two identical pots would be wired in parallel, not an L-pad.
So you have two wipers carrying the signal but now you have to consider the
paralleled resistance and pick the pots accordingly.
I was describing an Lpad. A pot (or parallel pots) cannot present a reasonably constant impedance to upstream components whereas an Lpad pretty much does. As a result, my inclination is to either construct a fixed Lpad out of two appropriate value resistors OR find a quality multi pole/multi position switch and construct a stepped Lpad (vs common continuously variable type made of two way different value rheostats .
A fixed resistive L Pad will avoid switch contacts, which is a good thing . Employ well chosen 10 Watt Rs.
Jeff
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: