Audio Asylum Thread Printer
Get a view of an entire thread on one page
|For Sale Ads|
In Reply to: RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant posted by Isaak J. Garvey on February 21, 2017 at 15:17:45
Almost certainly a hack. Highresaudio continue to offer MQA titles as I write (checked around 2 minutes ago). I also cannot imagine any genuine company run by professionals composing that final sentence. One would have to be very naive to do so. The use of English is also poor e.g. "none" for "no" and " offer use of freedom".
Also why would you post the discontinuance of a format on Twitter and Facebook but not mention it on your actual website ?
I would also add that the claim made in the posting does not add up technically ( as the claimed loss of 3 bits = 21 bits recovery and not 17 as MQA is "carried" in a 24 bit word).
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it is official.
Several posters on CA emailed HRA to see if indeed they were hacked and they CONFIRMED the message and reposted.:
"Breaking News: HIGHRESAUDIO to stop offering MQA. We decided not to offer and support MQA any longer. We will take MQA out of the shop by 01.03. We already have taken down the MQA icon and search function in our shop.
HIGHRESAUDIO stands for offering purity, original mastering source, none manipulated, tweaked or up-sampled content and codecs that are widely supported and offer use of freedom. You can trust us in what we do and have to offer!
We sincerely hope for the future, that MQA will supply analysis and verification tools in order to ensure the quality of product.
P.S. This is a revised version from our post yesterday! Which was not a fake. Upon request from MQA, we deleted that post."
Glad they revised the original post. That final sentence would have given MQA's lawyers a bonus. I guess that I must have seen the MQA tracks still there before 01.03 ( whatever time zone).
Just for interest MQA still list Highresaudio as a download partner.
Yep, clearly lawyers were involved.
I have information that the major online vendors of hirez audiophile downloads having been talking about blocking out MQA. This may or may not happen.
You can see why they would..Tidal is certainly disruptive to their download model.
" You can see why they would..Tidal is certainly disruptive to their download model. "
Very good point. As is the whole streaming phenomenon, MQA'd or not. It is just so substitutional.
I find it funny that not a SINGLE member of the audio press has reported this NOT ONE. Well, we know why.
But they get other insignificant BS up with in minutes.
Don't you work for Universal? I thought they were going ahead with MQA.
Yeh, and here is what no one is getting. The execs did not consult ONE production engineer, NOT ONE artist, an not ONE staff mastering engineer.
It is purely a cash grab for more exposure on streaming services.
The bogus MQA "process" has been applied AFTER mastering. It is NOT what the artists heard or intended.
MQA is pure fraud.
I have no interest in it.
I knew you would not.
Let me try to illustrate what MQA really is.
Imagine you have bought a few hundred albums from HDTracks, Superhirez.com, Qobuz, ProStudiomasters etc.
Out of the blue,because you have an epiphany after drinking tea in your English Garden, you decide you can make them sound "better" by "correcting" what you think are issues with the sound. You run the files through a pro mastering software, or even Adobe Audition, or similar.
You decide to call these files, which you have EQd, added timing and spatial effects, M Q A...
For Mercman's Quality Adjustments.
You convince people that your Mercman's Quality Adjustments are SUPERIOR to the files that came out of the mastering studio.
There my friend, you have it.
Gee, if they gave me a piece of the action, I might reconsider :-)
Wait! I forgot the BEST parts!
You decide you need proprietary decoding, which means the DAC must be able to "unwrap" your file, so you get DAC manufacturers to pay you a fee, and they have to send you their DAC and give you permission access it's DNA. And it gets better! You convince some idiotic record companies who would love to sell the 350th version of Kind Of Blue, to also pay you a fee.
You also claim that this process will save bandwidth for streaming, in a world where people are streaming HD Video without a hitch.
When 99% of DAC makers tell you they are not interested, you magically pivot to software decoding!
Post a Followup:
Post a Message!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: