Audio Asylum Thread Printer
Get a view of an entire thread on one page
|For Sale Ads|
In Reply to: RE: quantum physics is interesting. But it does not support mysticism posted by Analog Scott on October 22, 2023 at 11:19:28
So yes, i don't need to be aware of the silly coined word, flapdoodle. I simply agree that words beyond the maths inclination is misapplying the QM. I'm not bothered, quarks to a caveman would be you misapplying his whole brain.
Meaning, everything he knows, there's equally if not more in information he would have to know to be aware of something like quarks. There's more to know maybe... or not... things be dull...
Science isn't everything, it can't explain the universe from nothing.
To be aware of something like quarks* that should read. I don't know if you can edit on here.
I got it. Refresh shows the edit button after posting...
We work with what we can, i agree. But shifting objects around to make other objects is not my idea of fun... i like a bit of dimension to things, if that's not there... well... you crack on, i ain't dancing around cold logic like a native indian around his totem pole.
Post a Message!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: