|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.208.172.48
In Reply to: RE: Voecks says bi-wiring a speaker akes an audible difference? posted by Analog Scott on July 20, 2022 at 22:57:33
"Richard Vandersteen is a great speaker designer. but that doesn't mean he's right about bi-wiring."
Are you questioning the science? .... [-;
Follow Ups:
nope. The science is clear. Biwiring doesnt make an aduible differnece if you are already using competent speaker cables. I am pointing out that Richard Vandersteen can be a great speaker designer and still be wrong in his opinion about biwiring.
"The science is clear. Biwiring doesnt make an aduible differnece if you are already using competent speaker cables."
So what are the criteria that make speaker cables "competent?" ....
"I am pointing out that Richard Vandersteen can be a great speaker designer and still be wrong in his opinion about biwiring."
But Mr. Vandersteen represents science..... So quit being so anti-science...... It's embarrassing...... ;-]
nt
Maybe MIT or NASA will step up and figure this out.
"So what are the criteria that make speaker cables "competent?" ...."
capacitance, inductance and resistance
"But Mr. Vandersteen represents science....."
No, Richard Vandersteen does not represent science. 1. He isn't even a scientist. 2. No individual scientist represents science. There are no authorities in science. The only authority in science are the principles of science and the scientific method and objective evidence. When it comes to cables the evidence is the authority. And that evidence has spoken quite loudly and clearly. 3. Even scientists can be wrong. Heck, Einstein, one of the most famous scientists known to man was wrong in his opinion about the nature of qauntum mechanics and he was one of the primary scientists in the discovery of quantum physics.
"So quit being so anti-science...... It's embarrassing...... ;-]"
As embarassing as not knowing what actually is and is not anti-scientific?
"So what are the criteria that make speaker cables "competent?" ...."
capacitance, inductance and resistance
ALL cables have capacitance, inductance and resistance..... Even the worst snake oil products......
"So quit being so anti-science...... It's embarrassing...... ;-]"
As embarassing as not knowing what actually is and is not anti-scientific?
Exactly.....
The problem is someone claiming that he knows but lacks the realization that he does not.
> > > So what are the criteria that make speaker cables "competent?" ....> > >
> > capacitance, inductance and resistance > >
> ALL cables have capacitance, inductance and resistance..... Even the worst snake oil products......>
Yes. but the ones that have too much start to act as a passive equalizer and skew the audible frequency response. That's when the cables become "incompetently" designed. The ones that don't have too much are competently designed and don't audibly color the sound. Of course this is assuming the design goal is maximum audible transparency. A cable may be designed to color the sound on purpose.But we can call that a combination cable/passive equalizer.
and I did forget to mention basic shielding built into the design. If a cable doesn't have that then it is also "incompetently" designed.
I guess if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, you baffle them with bullshit......
once again you take the blatant anti-science anti electrical engineering position. There is no bullshit about the facts I stated when it comes to cable "sound." You may as well be saying evolution is bullshit.
But I'm not sure you didn't already say that....
Nt
shouldn't you be bagging aquarium gravel in your car/apartment? Or have sales and suckers who buy your B.S. all dried up leaving you nothing better to do than troll AA?
nt
:-)
Have you thought of asking your doctor to increase your medications?
Edits: 07/23/22
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: