 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
218.161.2.185
In Reply to: Hmmmmmm...... posted by bboroski on August 31, 2005 at 17:37:35:
Bill,Well, I just answered another poster who felt (not 'thought') that my carefully constructed question was "internally inconsistent". I thanked him for the full response he gave me nevertheless, and pointed out his error.
Whenever anyone comes up with the (undefined) charge of "troll" they deserve markedly less of a response. No, by "less" I'm being too kind; they deserve no (substantive) response, and that is the category for you.
P.S.: do you find you label 'troll' what you can't understand? (or is that a trolling question, too?)
Respect
(token),
Guy
Follow Ups:
OH...forgive me for questioning you and your
intent. I guess my FEEBLE brain cannot comphrehend
your TRUE INTENT. What don't you answer my question!!
I asked if you are writing some sort of paper or
are you someone who likes to simply start auguments/discussions.
Instead of answering me directly...you decide to
take a condescending tone with me. You could have
said..... Yes I am researching a paper...or no I
am not trolling, I like to start discussions like this.
But those would have been lucid, polite responses,
instead you choose to be a condescending A-HOLE!!!
I don't recall being in a PISSING match with you
lately so I guess I am just a casualty of your current
arguments/discussions with other inmates. I asked
for a response instead of calling you a TROLL directly.
And you did not answer.... So be it....NUFF SAID....BUZZ BUZZ BUZZ.....
NOT."I asked for a response instead of calling you a troll directly"
Guy
NTchuckle!
And is that a reaction at my expense? If not, precious (!)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
