![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
61.34.184.237
In Reply to: continuing the English lesson posted by Bruce from DC on May 11, 2005 at 06:10:37:
but they do net alot of pals (hee-hee). Seriously now: a neutrally worded subject heading is fine. It's done, and I've done it. An argumentative person would counter by saying "the more loaded/leading the question, the more passion is the answer" or some such justification. I imagine lawyers/attorneys know this very well and play this to their advantage: opinionated questions get real opinonated answers. Partiality reveals more partiality. No? Compare, just for fun's sake:
A: "Do you like your mother?"
B: [common answers] "She's great. I love her"
"I may not like her, but I love her"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -A: "What's to like about your mother?"
B: [common answer] "Why, everything. She's ... and .... and ... (ad
infinitum)
"Well, it's hard to say in words; I guess some
would say ... and some would say ..."Note: which gets the lengthier more revealing answer.
Note: "Is your mother likable?" falls somewhere in the middle (!)
P.S.: in my original post, by giving the 'easy out' ("I know. Nearly everyone" I think is what I said), it should have made the original question less of a test, less testy.
Follow Ups:
I can't tell if it was carefully worded to: help resolve an issue; extend the length of the thread; or something that only you might share with us. If you decide to use an analogy, please try to leave my mother out of it.
![]()
"Please try to leave my mother out of it"????
Are YOU trying to extend the length of this thread? With ununderstandable answers like that?
nt
![]()
NT
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: