 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Marantz CD recorders: DR6050 vs. DR6000 posted by nicko on September 10, 2003 at 16:36:48:
I have the DR6000. The only advantage of the dual deck is recording speed. You can make a CD recording twice as fast on the 6050. The DR6000 records at play speed. Some belive making the recordings at play speed renders a higher quality recording. I have found that the DR6000 makes very accurate recordings of vinyl. Many analog qualities shine through. If your not in a big hurry I would recomend the DR6000. In 2 years of using 80 minute CDs I haven't had any problems with the DR6000.
Follow Ups:
I have the DR4050 & the DR-17 reference recorder which betters the 6000. There IS a difference with the 4050 for convenience issues even after burning a cd-r/w in digital which is then protected by SCMS the 4050 will make an analog clone of it & not miss a track marker to boot. The 6000 & many others will say can not copy..etc. The DR-17 though is a far better playback deck than the 4050 which really shouldn't be used as such...........The only thing missing on both decks which my Elite recorder has is L & R independent level controls for tweakers & alike........
Thanks for all the reples.So the DR4050 can copy disks protected by SCMS eh? That would be a reason for me to go that route rather than the DR6000. Anybody know about whether the DR6050 can copy protected disks? Maybe the DR4050 is my best bet.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
