|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
172.250.53.19
In Reply to: RE: 2 weeks of MQA thoughts posted by bigshow on January 18, 2017 at 14:05:09
They are not traditional dacs (some are digital amps).
I have the C390DD and the difference between Tidal MQA vs Tidal CD or Deezer ranges from imperceptible to easily noticeable. An example of a track where the benefits are readily distinguishable is Merchant's track titled San Andreas Fault on her album named Tigerlily. The organ notes are less veiled with better resonance and decay. There are other albums where I cannot detect any difference.
The components in the NAD lineup that are MQA certified (some require a BluOS adapter that plugs into the modular chassis) include: C390DD, M12, M50, M32 and, although not listed on their site, probably the M2. NAD's amp topology these days is either Hypex's Ncore, UcD or Zetex's DDFA depending on the model.
Follow Ups:
What is MQA certified. Does that mean that Nad dacs will now decode MQA files?
Alan
Edits: 01/20/17
I don't know if that is universal lingo, but that is how NAD confirms that one of its components can decode MQA files
Edits: 01/20/17
Thanks. It is an unusual way of saying a dac has MQA decoding
Alan
a web search ("MQA" "certification") sheds some light. Here's an example from an interview with Bob Stuart (article attached):
"Q12. When will the MQA certification process for third party DAC partners be complete, such as the Mytek Brooklyn?A12. [Bob Stuart] The quick answer is always as soon as possible. Each certification process depends on the company and its model and how much work we have to do together to get the result that suits us both. We have a process in place and many products going through.
Q48. If my understanding is correct, DAC profiling would imply that the DAC model in question has to be sent from the manufacturer to Meridian for certification. Is this really a viable route from an IP standpoint and a practical way of doing it? Seems like a cumbersome and time consuming procedure in my view.
A48. [Bob Stuart]. This is not a Meridian question, MQA is a separate company (see Q76). The hardware and mobile licensing involves verification (which is normal in this industry) and we also work with our partners to optimise the conversion interface. We think it is viable. Perfection takes a bit longer."
Edits: 01/20/17 01/20/17 01/22/17
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: