|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.189.124.124
In Reply to: RE:"ESL's dont measure for crap , only the bad ones" posted by Ivan303 on December 16, 2016 at 19:26:56
(nt)
Follow Ups:
if Magnapan is the 'panel' speaker whose manufacturer wouldn't send product to Stereophile for review for fear of the possible measurements?Didn't recall what speaker it was.
Anyone who wants to send me a free pair of Sound Labs big panels for free, I'll take them and give a crap how they measure. Same with Quad 57's for that matter.
And those 'Line Magnetic' horns which would sound pretty good with my 300B SET amps I'm betting.. ;-)
Edits: 12/18/16
reviewed both the 1.6 and 3.6 back in the day. Even JA acknowledges that his testing methodology fails with large dipolars:
" As I have written before in these pages, measuring physically large speakers with in-room quasi-anechoic techniques is in some ways a fruitless task. The usual assumption, that the measuring microphone is very much farther away than the largest dimension of the speaker being measured, is clearly wrong."
Clearly wrong.
And yet, he seemed to really like the latest Martin-Logan hybrids in the latest issue. :)
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: