|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
160.39.32.96
In Reply to: RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 posted by fmak on October 30, 2016 at 08:41:05
>>Why on earth would any music company upsample red book asynchronously to 24 192 to archive? There are actually much better technical reasons to archive in DSD or DXD.<<
Agreed--who's doing that? Did I mis-write? All I intended to say was that Warner is reportedly digitizing its analog tapes to 192/24. One could have hoped for DXD or DSD, but 192/24 is fine.
This does raise an interesting question, though, one I didn't ask. Stuart and I talked a lot about "white-gloving" those early digital files in those obsolete, proprietary 16-bit formats; "white-gloving" is his phrase for the careful, custom work much of that music requires. But we talked about this in the context of conversion to MQA; we didn't discuss how one might archive those recordings and what format should be used.
>>The marketing phrase 'master quality' that I first encountered in Linn downloads has no real meaning as it depends on the native recording rates and bit depths.<<
It's true it has no technical, quantitative meaning--is that what you mean? As I've written more than once, those numbers have little directly to do with sound quality; it's easy to make a bad high-res recording. Within a certain technology--PCM say--bit depth and sampling frequency may put an upper limit on resolution (one aspect of good recorded sound), but how often is that upper limit ever approached? This appears to be a frequent point of confusion: people confuse file resolution with musical resolution.
As to the meaning of "master quality", it just depends how cynical you are. I think people cling to numbers because they're reliable, quantitative, more comfortable than relying on people and their work--like how well a recording is engineered, or whether the head of a company has good intentions. "Master quality" only means something--as I said to Bob Stuart in that interview (in a slightly different way)--if the people who sign off on it are serious and committed. (He agreed.)
"Master quality" is either an aspiration, or a marketing slogan, or both. How cynical are you?
>>Archiving valuable analog recordings is a subject in itself and should not in any way be linked to MQA.<<
The point here I think is just that the MQA process appears to be accelerating the pace of digitizing analog tapes. I don't think anyone is talking about MQA as an appropriate archival format. The MQA folks have said all along--since that earliest JAES paper--that the MQA idea is based on a clear separation of archival/storage and transmission formats. MQA is the latter.
Follow Ups:
Nonsense. Sony started to archive in DSD long long ago. Deterioration of the master magnetic tapes is the reason and if other companies don't do it, then this will be their loss.
MQA is just another marketing excuse.
"The point here I think is just that the MQA process appears to be accelerating the pace of digitizing analog tapes."
Can you provide any evidence that MQA has anything to do with pace of digitizing the catalog?
Until quite recently, Warner apparently still had thousands of analog tapes that had not yet been digitized. That's something they could have done at any time over the last, say, 20 years In May, they signed an agreement with MQA to transcode their whole catalog, and now it's happening and is scheduled to be completed by spring.
Is that proof? No. That's why I wrote "appears to be." But if there's no correlation it's a hell of a coincidence.
As someone who has written articles on MQA, you are positioning your self as an authority.
Your casual comment is a clearly intended to sound factual. If you don't understand this, that is rather perplexing.
The record companies have their own methods of work flow that depends on staff, changing technology, and priorities.
If Bob Stuart's comment is your only source, you need to do better than that.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: