|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.97.31.109
In Reply to: RE: Amazing list, thank you both... posted by Mats Gunnars on October 13, 2020 at 06:48:31
Claudio Arrau recorded all the Beethoven piano concertos with Haitink and the Concertgebouw on Philips label. Arrau does justice to everything he recorded (my opinion).
There is also a set of Beethoven piano concertos with Vladimir Ashkenazy. While he plays them well, the recordings are often either too bright or too closely mic'ed. Not always a sonic delight.
The early Vox set with Brendel and Wilfried Boettcher (also Mehta and Wallberg) was my first set of these concertos. I like them since they introduced me to the Beethoven concertos. The first concerto in that set is with Boettcher and the Stuttgart Philharmonic.
And of course there is the Michelangeli recording of the Beethoven 1st on DGG with Giulini and the Vienna Symphony. I like Michelangeli's recordings a lot.
Enjoy the music.
Follow Ups:
You disliked the sound on his concerto recordings, but which set did you mean? I believe he did these concerti with Mehta and Solti, and a third set in which he conducted the Cleveland. The Cleveland set has very good sound, and the Third is my current favorite among stereo versions.
I have the London Stereophonic pressing, not the Decca release. I think it is the London pressing that is the problem, not the artists or performances. The recording won a 1973 Grammy. From reviews I can find online, seems that the CD remastering was better. London pressings in that era are iffy, the FFSS sound the best.
Enjoy the music.
. . . I thought that the SQ on the one concerto I heard from that Ashkenazy/Solti set (No. 4) was notably inferior to the earlier recording in Chicago with Cliburn/Reiner (an excellent performance which may fly under the radar for a lot of people). I don't know if the Ashkenazy/Solti recording has been remastered and possibly improved in the meantime however (as you suggest).
which are notably better recordings and pressings than the London Stereophonics of the mid 70s. Mid-70s oil embargo affected the quality of vinyl pressings, it affects SQ on playback.
Enjoy the music.
Actually, I was referring to the realism and naturalness of the microphone set-up and the general acoustic - despite the RCA recording being a Dynagroove effort (ugh!). (I understand that the hall in Chicago had undergone a pretty disastrous renovation in the time between the Cliburn and Ashkenazy recordings.)
The Earl Wild Rach #2 mentioned in another thread is an RCA Dynagroove and it is a sonic spectacular. My copy is also first edition stamper, so that helps too.
I agree that as time went on, the Dynagroove lost some quality. I recall when we used to flex them since they were so thin. Yikes.
Enjoy the music.
The Earl Wild Rach 2 was issued on CD by Chandos, and also in a much better remastered version by Chesky.
But prefer the RCA sonics. If I run across the Chesky CD I will have to check it out.
Enjoy the music.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: