|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.97.31.109
In Reply to: RE: That reminds me though. . . posted by Chris from Lafayette on October 04, 2020 at 15:25:33
and cartridge, and tonearm, and phono stage, and shelf/stand ... oh yeah and a record cleaning machine. Forty years after being declared a dead format, there is far more and far better equipment available for playing records.
But seriously - it has been amazing to collection classical vinyl over the years. So much of it is not highly valued, making it wonderful as an enthusiast and a collector.
Enjoy the music.
Follow Ups:
. . . vinyl can't give me that third channel like I can get with the SACD. ;-)
I have sometimes added a third channel to my two channel system by putting a disconnected speaker in the center. I find it amusing when people comment on the difference it makes.
My experience with two channel has been that it can reproduce the acoustics that were captured during the recording - when the speaker placement and room acoustics allow it. My two channel stereo (with vinyl or CD) presents a complete wall-to-wall and floor-to-ceiling "image" or soundstage. It can also reproduce sounds above, beside and behind the listener. Some stereo recordings captured this, others not. It does require getting the speakers out into the room and away from rear and side walls, which can be impractical in some rooms. Rear firing ambience drivers help too.
I would agree that the recordings for multi-channel do a better job of the surround effects when played back on a multi-channel system.
Enjoy the music.
. . . is almost always better (more "solid" if you will) than a phantom center channel. And I acknowledge that the mileage will vary on this point for various listeners, depending on set-up, psychology, etc.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: