Cable Asylum

Re: Replacing video cable made no improvement

217.3.205.43

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display Email ] [ Cable Asylum ] [ FAQ ]

In Reply to: Replacing video cable made no improvement posted by Ed Sommer on September 23, 2002 at 10:04:13:

If you take into respect that a video signal is a signal
which is several hundreds of times more complicated to transmit by cable than an audio signal (see bandwidth und frequency range) then you get a good idea of how big the differences of different audio cables are.

Follow Ups:

Gee, ro-s - mvwine 12:30:57 09/23/02 (1)
you sound a lot like our long lost freind Fulton - and your ISP address looks a lot like his, too!

I gave at the office!
- Re: Gee, ro-s - Jon Risch 16:09:59 09/23/02 (0)
  Some digging by an inmate turned up this little tid-bit:
  prte79, ro-s and Fulton share 217.3.xxx.xxx
  and the writing style is similar for these three.
  Why, a person who disbelieves in audio cables, and has a burning need to post at a Cable forum, would not have any need to use sock-puppets, would they?
  
  Jon Risch

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

You can not post to an archived thread.