|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.61.206.100
In Reply to: RE: Response to third delete :) posted by E-Stat on June 11, 2017 at 16:26:57
Hint: It involves the use of an oscilloscope. If you know what one of those is, it's not too difficult to determine my test regiment.
I stand by my assertion that tube gear "sounds good", in part, due to its microphonic properties. The fact that you can change tube a preamplifier sonic signature by using tube dampers sort of illustrates my point.
Hope this wasn't too difficult to understand and that it answers your collective questions.
Follow Ups:
Hint: It involves the use of an oscilloscope. .
So, tell use what is good and what is bad on a sillyscope? Give us examples citing different tube dampers.
I stand by my assertion that tube gear "sounds good", in part, due to its microphonic properties.
Sorry to hear that.
Once again, you provide zilch in the way of definitive reasoning and conclusive answers. So what dampers have you used? Is that a difficult concept to grasp?
But then, that's we fully expect of you. In lieu of conclusive answers - you've yet to answer either Ricks or mine - you paint vague responses and reference topics but never understand the questions.
We'll leave it there as usual. :)
Tell you what... PM me your shipping address and I'll send you my Hameg HM-605 oscilloscope and my testing procedure then you can replicate my tests and publish your results. You pay for one-way shipping costs and you may keep the scope when you're done. Win, win - you and everyone else will benefit from your learning experience!
Btw, I don't recall the OP mentioning he was trying to solve a "brightness problem" with his Rogue gear.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: