|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
208.131.186.2
In Reply to: RE: Nope posted by E-Stat on May 16, 2011 at 10:59:38
E-Stat: - Well, you're certainly a piece of.....work. Now I'm certain of the reason for your deliberate ambiguity. (Talk about bait & swoop). But why bother with that charade? You must really lead a miserable life. The evidence is there to see, you're already exposed for what you are. Look back at the thread - and then move-on. I'm gone!
Edits: 05/16/11 05/16/11 05/16/11Follow Ups:
The evidence is there to see...
Indeed it is. My comments have been clear and consistent:
1. Don't experience that with my Audio Research preamp.
2. In my case, I find no difference in tonal quality between using my ARC preamp vs. DACT attenuators with a GamuT CD-1.
3. I don't perceive any change of tonal balance when the preamp is bypassed and replaced by attenuators.
4. I got extremely smooth response from 25 hz to 200 hz.
5. Regardless of the sonic signature of various components, you want a neutral result in the end. In room measurements vary by +- 1.5 db from 30 hz to 200 hz. As compared to live sources like my wife's baby grand, the lower midrange is as neutral as it measures.
6. No, I don't want *more* warmth. I took considerable pains to get audibly and measurably flat response and that is where I want the sound to stay.
I recommend that you redouble your efforts with understanding the English language. Best of luck with your crusade. :)
rw
E-Stat:
By picking out snippets to show yourself in a favorable light, don't you think the astute amongst us will immediately recognize your ploy to divert them from looking at the full thread and comfirming what a diabolical creature you really are? Why should you want to be so 'helpful'? Let them see for themselves.
I'm not inclined to bother with your quip about the english language, except to remind... no.. ...inform you.... that the onus is on the comunicator to get his message across, in as clear and concise a manner as is possible. Mixed-messages, garbled ambiguity, and a general lack of clarity (deliberate, or otherwise) causing 'misunderstandings', is a reflection on the sender (the communicator) not on the recipient of said (mixed) messages. Or weren't you aware?
...that's the only explanation I can think of to explain your responses.
You've overstayed your welcome here. Next time you ask for input, accept it for what it is. Don't try to convince everyone that they need to adopt your point of view.
AbeCollins: - Don't be a fool. It's good the thread exists to look back on. I do have an opinion on the subject, but the content of my posts does not support your dishonest arguments. You are the main individual who has tried persistently to imply that I'm seeking to impose my views on others. Of what benefit would that be to me? What do I care whether you do as I do, or share my views? Your nefarious mind refuses to accept that this may just be a quest to gauge opinion on a pertinent topic. No, you prefer to highlight my own opinion, and attack it. Get real!
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: