|
Tubes Asylum: RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval by mikemalter Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
For Sale Ads |
173.11.78.61
In Reply to: RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval posted by Len_ on November 29, 2010 at 12:01:35:
Len,
It would make sense to me that the round mica would contribute to increased microphonics in that it is touching the glass on the inside.
I think that for some people a more agressive treble may be desireable.
I'm going to have to put these guys up for sale.
Thanks.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - mikemalter 21:09:21 11/26/10 ( 10)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - Len_ 12:01:35 11/29/10 ( 1)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - mikemalter 11/29/10 12:23:01 11/29/10 ( 0)
RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - Ed Sawyer 10:25:38 11/28/10 ( 5)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - mikemalter 13:19:41 11/28/10 ( 4)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - JG2 13:41:02 11/28/10 ( 3)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - mikemalter 16:32:19 11/28/10 ( 2)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - JG2 20:47:53 11/28/10 ( 1)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - JG2 20:52:19 11/28/10 ( 0)
RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - JG2 10:50:18 11/27/10 ( 1)
- RE: Tung-Sol 6SN7G mica shape; round vs. Oval - mikemalter 14:26:02 11/27/10 ( 0)