|
Speaker Asylum: RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers by Croc General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
For Sale Ads |
109.66.19.215
In Reply to: RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers posted by pushpulltriode on November 6, 2011 at 12:58:15:
91 Hz is very tought challenge for sub.
it's built for making low freq with 1/4 wave of 5m.
to do good freq with 1/4 wave legth of 1.5m with the same quality is totally different universe.
i guess it's possible.
but to do it without compromising quality of the low bass (and this is primary reason of sub bass system) will be very difficlut and very expensive.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - Croc 08:32:31 11/5/11 ( 11)
- RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - fantja 20:12:29 11/7/11 ( 0)
Before I take exception. - Vic D 01:12:35 11/6/11 ( 1)
- RE: Before I take exception. - Atver 06:43:54 11/6/11 ( 0)
I own Paradigm and REL - Atver 23:04:20 11/5/11 ( 0)
RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - pushpulltriode 15:16:04 11/5/11 ( 5)
- RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - Croc 22:12:42 11/5/11 ( 4)
- RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - pushpulltriode 12:58:15 11/6/11 ( 3)
- RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - Croc 11/7/11 11:51:21 11/7/11 ( 1)
- RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - pushpulltriode 17:30:52 11/7/11 ( 0)
- Sorry! I mix up the model in my previous post, and it should be Studio, not Stadium! (NT) - pushpulltriode 18:24:51 11/6/11 ( 0)
RE: REVIEW: REL Acoustics Stentor III Speakers - Croc 08:34:12 11/5/11 ( 0)