|
Inmate Central: Rationing isn't contingent on SPR volumes. by Road Warrior Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
For Sale Ads |
104.185.157.178
In Reply to: What part of 36 year low do you not understand ? posted by emailtim on July 1, 2022 at 10:59:38:
The current drawdowns are for the purpose of adding additional volumes to the world market in an attempt to keep oil prices down. Drawdowns from the SPR could be at zero (like it was most months historically the last few decades) and we wouldn't have rationing.
Perhaps I misunderstood your post?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Who here said that OPEC was already pumping at max capacity? - Carl G 09:07:26 07/1/22 ( 52)
- RE: Who here said that OPEC was already pumping at max capacity? - RGA 16:36:13 07/1/22 ( 2)
- RE: Who here said that OPEC was already pumping at max capacity? - double28 16:55:29 07/1/22 ( 1)
- +1 What a Bullshit bill! - Rod M 17:48:06 07/1/22 ( 0)
US Strategic Oil Reserves at a 36 year low and dropping. - emailtim 10:41:48 07/1/22 ( 25)
- There must be a strategy to tap the reserves ....I trust this administration to make great decisions... - Carl G 12:20:43 07/1/22 ( 1)
- RE: "and, at what price will they be re-filled" - Ivan303 13:01:27 07/1/22 ( 0)
Over 500+ million bbl not enough? - Ivan303 10:57:46 07/1/22 ( 22)
- What part of 36 year low do you not understand ? - emailtim 10:59:38 07/1/22 ( 21)
- Rationing isn't contingent on SPR volumes. - Road Warrior 07/2/22 11:42:43 07/2/22 ( 4)
- RE: Rationing isn't contingent on SPR volumes. - emailtim 11:54:16 07/2/22 ( 3)
- Sure it is. It's adding to global supply. "Keeping to down" is relative - Road Warrior 08:06:38 07/3/22 ( 2)
- RE: Sure it is. It's adding to global supply. "Keeping to down" is relative - emailtim 09:22:54 07/3/22 ( 1)
- I feel your pain - Road Warrior 11:20:48 07/3/22 ( 0)
- Please get your facts straight... - samstone 07:33:11 07/2/22 ( 1)
- RE: Please get your facts straight... - emailtim 11:51:16 07/2/22 ( 0)
With over 500 million bbl in reserve.. - Ivan303 11:21:33 07/1/22 ( 13)
- FIFY: With UNDER 500 million bbl in reserve.. - emailtim 11:35:07 07/1/22 ( 12)
- OMFG! The Strategic Oil Reserve is down to 497.9 million bbl ... - Ivan303 16:57:08 07/1/22 ( 3)
- RE: OMFG! The Strategic Oil Reserve is down to 497.9 million bbl ... - Inmate51 18:48:22 07/1/22 ( 1)
- Sure... - Ivan303 19:28:40 07/1/22 ( 0)
- LOL, you're a treat !!! - emailtim 17:17:23 07/1/22 ( 0)
RE: FIFY: With UNDER 500 million bbl in reserve.. - Ivan303 11:43:19 07/1/22 ( 7)
- Fear is the lifeblood of wingnuts. nt - Rick W 12:25:02 07/1/22 ( 3)
- RE: Fear is the lifeblood of wingnuts. nt - Inmate51 13:46:22 07/1/22 ( 2)
- LOL) As opposed to the paupers on Fox? nt - Rick W 08:50:23 07/2/22 ( 0)
- We get it for free here... N/T - musetap 13:58:24 07/1/22 ( 0)
"Why are you so fearful about EVERYTHING?"... - musetap 12:00:33 07/1/22 ( 2)
- If I call correctly, .... - emailtim 13:02:25 07/1/22 ( 1)
- "So who is fearful about EVERYTHING ???..." - musetap 13:41:46 07/1/22 ( 0)
RE: "OPEC+ agrees to raise oil production by 648,000 bpd in August" - Ivan303 10:25:29 07/1/22 ( 10)
- Dumping the strategic reserves isn't going to last very long. - emailtim 10:28:36 07/1/22 ( 9)
- We're not DUMPING our strategic reserves... - Ivan303 11:15:53 07/1/22 ( 8)
- Your plot is out of date, we are below 500 and dropping (nt) - emailtim 13:07:18 07/1/22 ( 7)
- RE: Your plot is out of date, we are below 500 and dropping (nt) - Inmate51 13:55:37 07/1/22 ( 6)
- RE: Your plot is out of date, we are below 500 and dropping (nt) - emailtim 14:01:58 07/1/22 ( 5)
- A single valid character - Steve O 14:14:47 07/1/22 ( 4)
- Please... - musetap 14:31:54 07/1/22 ( 3)
- Sorry 'bout that . . . - Steve O 16:26:07 07/1/22 ( 2)
- I can appreciate that and support it... - musetap 17:42:00 07/1/22 ( 1)
- I'm shocked I tell you, simply shocked ;-) (nt) - Steve O 19:26:29 07/1/22 ( 0)
I could be wrong but I suspect you mis-read or misunderstood. I believe post to which you refer was - jdaniel@jps.net 09:23:49 07/1/22 ( 1)
- RE: I could be wrong but I suspect you mis-read or misunderstood. I believe post to which you refer was - srdavis2000 10:37:48 07/1/22 ( 0)
I thought it meant max of the OPEC output quotas they fight over. nt - nilknarf 09:16:28 07/1/22 ( 1)
- RE: I thought it meant max of the OPEC output quotas they fight over. nt - emailtim 10:01:08 07/1/22 ( 0)
I think it was the gullible apologists that naively thought they were maxed out. (nt) - emailtim 09:12:30 07/1/22 ( 7)
- Like the National Reveiw? - Ivan303 10:06:45 07/1/22 ( 6)
- How can you fault a publication for quoting Macron - nilknarf 10:09:30 07/1/22 ( 5)
- Well, for starters.... - Ivan303 10:16:16 07/1/22 ( 4)
- maybe cause they don't wanna just make shit up - nilknarf 10:24:08 07/1/22 ( 3)
- Either that... - Ivan303 10:32:42 07/1/22 ( 2)
- RE: Either that... - nilknarf 10:38:16 07/1/22 ( 1)
- What's your solution for bringing oil prices down quickly? nt - Rick W 11:03:58 07/1/22 ( 0)