![]() ![]() |
Hi-Rez Highway: RE: Tommy did you try the Wadia 581iSE in system 1 or 2? by Yoav New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
For Sale Ads |
76.25.15.177
In Reply to: RE: Tommy did you try the Wadia 581iSE in system 1 or 2? posted by Interested on March 21, 2009 at 17:59:43:
Dear Teresa,
This is Yoav Geva, designer of the YG Acoustics Anat Reference II Professional. Please allow me to elaborate on the issue of anechoic response versus in-room response:
First, you are absolutely correct in that a speaker with a flat anechoic response may not have a flat in-room response. Every room has its own acoustics.
However, anechoic response is nonetheless critical. When listening, we first perceive the direct sound, before any echoes arrive. This is the signal that provides our brain with most of the soundstage and tonal information in the recording. A signal with a flat frequency response and no relative phase deviations will provide us with a lifelike experience in these aspects.
Next, the first reflections arrive. These have hit room surfaces only once, and therefore are "colored" once by the room, and also by the speaker's dispersion. After all, the signal for these echoes leaves the speaker at an off-axis angle. Please note that a musician playing live music in the same room would cause the exact same effect - the direct sound is neutral, and the first reflections are "colored" once by the room. The first reflections are used by our brain mainly to determine the size of the room, and also have some (but less than direct sound) contribution to the tonality of the speaker. Therefore a more neutral room is still superior to a heavily "colored" one.
Last, more echoes arrive. These later reflections have hit room surfaces multiple times, and are far more "colored" by the room than the first reflections. They "tell" our brain mostly about the room, and less about the musical performance.
A good speaker, therefore, must have both a flat anechoic response and uniform dispersion. But even with those two, its in-room response will heavily depend on the room. And while heavily "colored" rooms may affect the perceived tonality in some respect, the direct ("anechoic") sound is mainly responsible for our perception of tonality, which means that even if the in-room response is not flat when averaging direct sound and echoes without looking at timing (which is what in-room measurements typically do), it may be perceived as completely flat if the time until the echoes arrive is long enough, and the speaker's dispersion is uniform enough to make sure that only the room colors the echoes, rather than the speaker.
Last but not least, there is one thing which I don't know whether you have paid attention to (if you have, please accept my apologies): you are comparing the in-room responses of two speakers, measured in two different rooms. It is important to note that in-room measurements of two speakers can only be compared if the rooms are identical. The Burmester B25 was measured in LG's room, whereas the YG Acoustics Anat Reference II Professional was measured in WP's room. While I cannot clearly state at this time which room is "better" (I would need to look at measurements with timing information to know more), it is quite clear that they are very different.
If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Please use the "Contact Us" screen on my website, or this forum.
Best,
Yoav Geva
President
YG Acoustics LLC
Yoav Geva (Gonczarowski)
YG Acoustics
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - TommyTunes 07:01:43 03/19/09 ( 211)
- Gentleman....you misunderstood me - TommyTunes 16:44:57 03/19/09 ( 0)
you are listing to fake sound... - MC-SACDs 09:35:37 03/19/09 ( 61)
- If upsampled is fake, then original is at least half-faked - Tony Lauck 12:09:52 03/21/09 ( 7)
- RE: If upsampled is fake, then original is at least half-faked - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:15:58 03/25/09 ( 2)
- RE: If upsampled is fake, then original is at least half-faked - Tony Lauck 09:04:31 03/25/09 ( 1)
- RE: If upsampled is fake, then original is at least half-faked - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:07:31 03/25/09 ( 0)
- Tony I knew what "MC-SACDs" was taking about and you do too. - Teresa 16:53:04 03/21/09 ( 3)
- you did not understand his point... - tunenut 18:33:30 03/21/09 ( 2)
- read my post again the only "guessing" is with UPSAMPLING! not the original sampling! - Teresa 19:06:05 03/21/09 ( 1)
- upsampling cannot recreate the original master sound (24bit/96kHz or DSD) resolution - Hiro 02:47:15 03/22/09 ( 0)
RE: you are listing to fake sound... - Ben Van Dyk 19:00:31 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: you are listing to fake sound... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:25:17 03/20/09 ( 25)
- You just do not get it do you? Some of us prefer REAL resolution to artificially created resolution. - Teresa 16:49:05 03/20/09 ( 24)
- RE: You just do not get it do you? Some of us prefer REAL resolution to artificially created resolution. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 01:16:04 03/22/09 ( 2)
- I wasn't talking to him, I was responding to your post, you are the one who does not get it. (nt) - Teresa 03:11:42 03/22/09 ( 1)
- Hokely Dokely. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 07:41:10 03/22/09 ( 0)
- LOL! Teresa, please see my profiles for system equipment. , - TommyTunes 04:58:50 03/21/09 ( 17)
- Tommy did you try the Wadia 581iSE in system 1 or 2? - Teresa 17:09:08 03/21/09 ( 16)
- RE: Tommy did you try the Wadia 581iSE in system 1 or 2? - Interested 17:59:43 03/21/09 ( 7)
- RE: Tommy did you try the Wadia 581iSE in system 1 or 2? - Yoav 03/28/09 19:32:35 03/28/09 ( 0)
- Specs and measurement in room are very different - jazz1 23:23:57 03/21/09 ( 0)
- It's simple those who do not get the full sonic benefit of SACD can still benefit from Surround Sound - Teresa 18:36:05 03/21/09 ( 4)
- RE: It's simple those who do not get the full sonic benefit of SACD can still benefit from Surround Sound - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:46:01 03/25/09 ( 1)
- RE: It's simple those who do not get the full sonic benefit of SACD can still benefit from Surround Sound - Tony Lauck 11:53:30 03/25/09 ( 0)
- RE: You just throw out different concepts at the spur of the moment - navman 20:10:21 03/21/09 ( 1)
- Evidently they don't or I would not have had to respond to "Interested's" questions. - Teresa 21:00:07 03/21/09 ( 0)
Teresa, you crack me up. BTW it's in system 2 - TommyTunes 17:31:05 03/21/09 ( 7)
- Great with the Maggies, try your AR pre and power in System Two - Teresa 17:43:25 03/21/09 ( 6)
- Evidently you know little about Equipment other than published specs... - TommyTunes 05:05:52 03/22/09 ( 1)
- Tommy sorry to hear your AR's won't drive you Maggies, I also have hard to drive speakers. - Teresa 06:12:17 03/22/09 ( 0)
- RE: Who cares? - navman 20:13:00 03/21/09 ( 3)
- RE: Who cares? - Frank I 06:53:58 03/22/09 ( 0)
- He may be interested in getting the best sound from SACD, clearly you are not - Teresa 21:03:17 03/21/09 ( 1)
- RE: He may be interested in getting the best sound from SACD, clearly you are not - navman 05:41:55 03/22/09 ( 0)
RE: Do you just make things up as you go along? - navman 19:56:23 03/20/09 ( 2)
- I have said all of this before! Were you not paying attention? Or did you forget? - Teresa 20:03:09 03/20/09 ( 1)
- If you say so. NT - navman 20:07:30 03/20/09 ( 0)
Would make sense you register before posting - navman 06:07:53 03/20/09 ( 20)
- RE: Would make sense you register before posting - rich121 00:15:48 03/21/09 ( 0)
I see nothing dogmatic or pompous in "MC-SACDs" posts. - Teresa 16:02:42 03/20/09 ( 18)
- RE: ROFLMAO - navman 16:19:56 03/20/09 ( 17)
- You are clearly and completely the one who is a troll, you have proven this many times in the past! - Teresa 16:41:09 03/20/09 ( 16)
- RE: As I said - navman 19:51:42 03/20/09 ( 15)
- RE: As I said - no such thing as an SACD troll on the Hi-Rez highway, registered or not - Teresa 19:59:54 03/20/09 ( 14)
- RE: Well hopefully they can - navman 20:40:49 03/20/09 ( 13)
- RE: Well hopefully they can - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 18:07:22 03/23/09 ( 12)
- You have that just a wee bit incorrect. - Teresa 01:35:59 03/24/09 ( 4)
- RE: You have that just a wee bit incorrect. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 01:55:52 03/24/09 ( 3)
- No it means exactly what I said "SACD bashing" something you, Chris Redmond find natural. - Teresa 02:18:50 03/24/09 ( 2)
- The problem is that all SACD Players also play CD, therefore..... - TommyTunes 06:08:52 03/24/09 ( 1)
- Some further thoughts - Teresa 15:02:11 03/24/09 ( 0)
- That, my friend - navman 18:57:46 03/23/09 ( 6)
- You too may love Chris Redmond's new "SACD bashing forum", have fun - Teresa 01:41:42 03/24/09 ( 5)
- RE: I would wager a bet - navman 08:52:44 03/24/09 ( 4)
- I post more on SA-CD.net and enjoy it more as it is free of CD trolls like yourself. - Teresa 14:36:40 03/24/09 ( 3)
- "if I am ever made monitor" - tunenut 17:36:44 03/24/09 ( 0)
- RE: I post more on SA-CD.net and enjoy it more as it is free of CD trolls like yourself. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:45:56 03/24/09 ( 0)
- RE: Wrong - navman 16:15:46 03/24/09 ( 0)
If it sounds good what's the problem?? - jazz1 10:01:15 03/19/09 ( 4)
- have you used Photoshop? - MC-SACDs 11:07:47 03/19/09 ( 2)
- of course it can... - tunenut 12:49:24 03/19/09 ( 1)
- Haha....good point - navman 12:19:50 03/20/09 ( 0)
I don't think you get the point - tunenut 11:00:37 03/19/09 ( 0)
RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - Allen Wright 08:52:21 03/19/09 ( 139)
- I've either owned or had for loan.... - TommyTunes 16:52:01 03/19/09 ( 4)
- Apples and Oranges... - rich121 00:14:16 03/21/09 ( 0)
- Would like to read your comments on Sony 5400. nt - oldmkvi 13:37:49 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: I've either owned or had for loan.... - jazz1 23:39:56 03/19/09 ( 1)
- RE: I've either owned or had for loan.... - TommyTunes 05:09:22 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - Karltoo 11:55:47 03/19/09 ( 133)
- Karl, I agree 100%. (nt) - Allen Wright 02:34:50 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - jazz1 12:53:11 03/19/09 ( 0)
RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - MC-SACDs 12:51:03 03/19/09 ( 130)
- RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - Allen Wright 02:33:46 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - jazz1 23:35:45 03/19/09 ( 17)
- Good sound and high resolution are not necessarily the same thing. - Teresa 20:40:19 03/20/09 ( 1)
- That explains why SACD failed LOL! [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:03:28 03/26/09 ( 0)
RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - MC-SACDs 10:54:47 03/20/09 ( 14)
- RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - jazz1 20:18:31 03/20/09 ( 13)
- RE: As I have said this is a - navman 20:22:49 03/20/09 ( 12)
- MC-SACDs is not a troll, you are. Why do you get everything backwards? - Teresa 20:26:10 03/20/09 ( 11)
- RE: Habit maybe? - navman 20:30:13 03/20/09 ( 10)
- I don't have the slightest idea? But everything MC-SACDs has said so far makes perfect sense to me. - Teresa 20:44:30 03/20/09 ( 9)
- RE: By all means go ahead and try to get - navman 20:47:27 03/20/09 ( 8)
- I can augment SACD but they haven't invented anything worthy to move on to yet. - Teresa 02:41:09 03/21/09 ( 1)
- RE: I can augment SACD but they haven't invented anything worthy to move on to yet. - navman 12:08:22 03/21/09 ( 0)
- RE: By all means go ahead and try to get - Hiro 01:50:20 03/21/09 ( 5)
- RE: By all means go ahead and try to get - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 07:50:13 03/22/09 ( 4)
- I'm sure he means the second definition not the first in which case there's room for billions! - Teresa 08:53:48 03/23/09 ( 1)
- RE: I'm sure he means the second definition not the first in which case there's room for billions! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:50:52 03/23/09 ( 0)
- Or maybe - navman 19:02:35 03/22/09 ( 1)
- I agree. Probably even wear the same....socks? [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 04:49:43 03/25/09 ( 0)
RE: Wadia 581iSE, the best sounding SACD player I've heard but.... - Interested 23:27:00 03/19/09 ( 109)
- How many of those 4 SACDs were DSD recorded using excellent full range microphones in a REAL acoustical space? - Teresa 02:13:13 03/20/09 ( 108)
- Hilarious!! - Sordidman 13:01:06 03/20/09 ( 4)
- By your own admission you like Rock and not Classical and I only know of one DSD recorded Rock SACD - Teresa 16:59:50 03/20/09 ( 3)
- RE: By your own admission you like Rock and not Classical and I only know of one DSD recorded Rock SACD - Interested 19:41:25 03/20/09 ( 2)
- the only possible answer is "self delusion" you will of course someday realize how bad CDs sound - Teresa 20:06:00 03/20/09 ( 1)
- RE: the only possible answer is "self delusion" you will of course someday realize how bad CDs sound - Interested 11:57:28 03/21/09 ( 0)
- "gigantic" is relative - tunenut 11:32:06 03/20/09 ( 14)
- Personally I am NOT impressed with the sonics of the MTT's Mahler SACDs and have spoken out against them - Teresa 16:35:36 03/20/09 ( 1)
- RE: Personally I am NOT impressed with the sonics of the MTT's Mahler SACDs and have spoken out against them - MC-SACDs 19:58:46 03/22/09 ( 0)
- RE: "gigantic" is relative - MC-SACDs 15:37:00 03/20/09 ( 11)
- LOL - navman 16:18:33 03/20/09 ( 10)
- I've been thinking about something for a very long time - Teresa 16:41:30 03/23/09 ( 1)
- RE: Really? - navman 08:02:49 03/24/09 ( 0)
- You LOL at me? - MC-SACDs 20:26:08 03/22/09 ( 7)
- LOL - navman 13:48:20 03/23/09 ( 6)
- You sure choose weird things to laugh it - Teresa 16:31:32 03/23/09 ( 5)
- Sounding somewhat - navman 18:59:03 03/23/09 ( 4)
- No way! You clearly are not happy here, perhaps you would be happier posting somewhere else? - Teresa 01:48:54 03/24/09 ( 3)
- RE: I post in other places - navman 04:42:52 03/24/09 ( 2)
- Navman the problem is you and other CD trolls. - Teresa 15:11:40 03/24/09 ( 1)
- Nonsense - navman 16:16:16 03/24/09 ( 0)
congrats ... - TBone 11:13:11 03/20/09 ( 1)
- You then HAVE NOT HEARD WHAT SACD and high resolution digital can do! - Teresa 16:07:13 03/20/09 ( 0)
Sony's brochure was a piece of - navman 07:01:42 03/20/09 ( 2)
- 10 years of listening has proven Sony's goals and aims stated in their brochure to be 100% true IMHO! - Teresa 17:07:53 03/20/09 ( 1)
- RE: Marketing ........................................................ - navman 19:50:01 03/20/09 ( 0)
It really doesn' matter if Rock and Pop record in DSD... - TommyTunes 05:35:08 03/20/09 ( 51)
- RE: It really doesn' matter if Rock and Pop record in DSD... - Teresa 17:26:47 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: It really doesn' matter if Rock and Pop record in DSD... - Hiro 10:13:49 03/20/09 ( 48)
- RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - navman 10:46:18 03/20/09 ( 47)
- Whatever happen's please remain calm!! - jazz1 20:24:51 03/20/09 ( 1)
- LOL............................. - navman 20:45:05 03/20/09 ( 0)
- RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - Hiro 13:06:17 03/20/09 ( 44)
- RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - Interested 13:48:47 03/20/09 ( 19)
- I totally disagree, record companies MUST spend the money for an SACD layer or they will die! - Teresa 17:49:47 03/20/09 ( 5)
- RE: I totally disagree, record companies MUST spend the money for an SACD layer or they will die! - Interested 19:38:16 03/20/09 ( 4)
- no, it is you who are totally and completely deluded. - Hiro 02:45:20 03/21/09 ( 0)
- RE: I totally disagree, record companies MUST spend the money for an SACD layer or they will die! - Ben Van Dyk 20:56:42 03/20/09 ( 0)
- If the SACD layer was added to all CDs, the majority of the public will buy - Teresa 20:24:03 03/20/09 ( 1)
- RE: If the SACD layer was added to all CDs, the majority of the public will buy - Interested 05:13:28 03/21/09 ( 0)
RE: My dear kekel from teh parallell universe. - Hiro 14:27:39 03/20/09 ( 12)
- I beg to differ. - navman 14:35:35 03/20/09 ( 11)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Hiro 14:48:01 03/20/09 ( 4)
- RE: I beg to differ. - navman 16:17:05 03/20/09 ( 3)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Hiro 16:34:24 03/20/09 ( 2)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Tony Lauck 17:54:51 03/20/09 ( 1)
- At least my view is that - navman 20:19:40 03/20/09 ( 0)
- RE: I beg to differ. - Hiro 14:42:56 03/20/09 ( 5)
- Same with 4-5Gigs - navman 16:15:17 03/20/09 ( 4)
- 4,7GB (SACD) is enough for high resolution music - Hiro 16:28:59 03/20/09 ( 3)
- RE: Limiting. - navman 19:54:43 03/20/09 ( 2)
- RE: Limiting. - Hiro 02:08:46 03/21/09 ( 1)
- Really? - navman 04:33:23 03/21/09 ( 0)
BTW - navman 13:13:16 03/20/09 ( 23)
- RE: BTW - Teresa 18:01:01 03/20/09 ( 1)
- Maybe I should sell you all of mines - navman 19:58:21 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: BTW - Hiro 13:34:43 03/20/09 ( 20)
- Hiro....... could you ost up your system? - navman 20:25:30 03/20/09 ( 7)
- RE: Hiro....... could you ost up your system? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:02:01 03/22/09 ( 6)
- I am sure I could guess at their systems. - navman 19:15:08 03/23/09 ( 5)
- MC-SACDs is not a troll, you are. You do know this forum is about SACD software and hardware don't you? - Teresa 02:03:49 03/24/09 ( 4)
- RE: MC-SACDs is not a troll, you are. You do know this forum is about SACD software and hardware don't you? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:15:09 03/24/09 ( 3)
- You are making NO SENSE WHATSOEVER, Mr. Troll. - Teresa 02:25:12 03/24/09 ( 2)
- Hearing vs. Claiming to hear - Tony Lauck 08:20:27 03/24/09 ( 0)
- RE: You are making NO SENSE WHATSOEVER, Mr. Troll. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:12:27 03/24/09 ( 0)
Actually if you pay attention - navman 13:59:34 03/20/09 ( 11)
- Oxymoron alert: There is no such thing as an "SACD troll" on the Hi-Rez Highway. - Teresa 17:55:37 03/20/09 ( 10)
- RE: haha - navman 19:59:38 03/20/09 ( 9)
- It is true that SACD isn't the only Hi-Rez but the Hi-Rez Highway is ONLY for SACDs after the divide. - Teresa 01:09:13 03/21/09 ( 8)
- RE: Since you are so fond of repeating yourself, let me indulge too........ - navman 13:50:10 03/23/09 ( 7)
- You still do not understand! The ONLY Hi-Rez on the Hi-Rez Highway is SACD! - Teresa 16:28:06 03/23/09 ( 6)
- RE: LOL - navman 19:12:41 03/23/09 ( 5)
- Mr. Troll everything you said untrue of course! - Teresa 03:22:27 03/24/09 ( 4)
- Teresa, you need to take on another issue, why are we limited to 2.8MKz SACD the standard needs to be changed - TommyTunes 06:30:34 03/24/09 ( 2)
- I was a champion of "Super DVD" which used 5.6MKz DSD - Teresa 15:39:25 03/24/09 ( 0)
- RE: +1 - navman 08:09:40 03/24/09 ( 0)
- RE: Ms. Troll everything you said untrue of course! - navman 04:41:22 03/24/09 ( 0)
RE: It really doesn' matter if Rock and Pop record in DSD... - navman 06:55:43 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: How many of those 4 SACDs were DSD recorded using excellent full range microphones in a REAL acoustical sp - Interested 03:14:42 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: How many of those 4 SACDs were DSD recorded using excellent full range microphones in a REAL acoustical space? - Allen Wright 02:37:22 03/20/09 ( 29)
- Interesting Allen, I know a lot of musical instrument overtones extend beyond 100kHz - Teresa 17:34:45 03/21/09 ( 1)
- RE: Interesting Allen, I know a lot of musical instrument overtones extend beyond 100kHz - Allen Wright 03:49:01 03/22/09 ( 0)
RE: How many of those 4 SACDs were DSD recorded using excellent full range microphones in a REAL acoustical sp - Interested 02:57:17 03/20/09 ( 26)
- Not all? - Allen Wright 04:17:27 03/21/09 ( 25)
- RE: Not all? - Interested 01:12:17 03/22/09 ( 24)
- RE: Not all? - MC-SACDs 12:35:58 03/23/09 ( 23)
- RE: Not all? - navman 14:42:08 03/23/09 ( 22)
- RE: Not all? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:21:43 03/24/09 ( 3)
- I have known of and realized the benefit of ultrasonic frequencies for over 25 years. - Teresa 04:23:35 03/24/09 ( 0)
- OK I'm getting tired of you knocking my SACD player to other people which is very childish BTW - Teresa 03:50:04 03/24/09 ( 1)
- RE: OK I'm getting tired of you knocking my SACD player to other people which is very childish BTW - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:03:00 03/24/09 ( 0)
- here is,, to get yourself a start of education... - MC-SACDs 14:58:49 03/23/09 ( 17)
- wasted effort, I gave up trying to teach Navman anything, especially ultrasonic theory. - Teresa 17:02:17 03/23/09 ( 16)
- "Super sonic"? Wouldn't that cause a sonic boom? So good of you to educate us.....[nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:15:52 03/26/09 ( 0)
- Sounds that cannot be heard? - Tony Lauck 10:20:17 03/24/09 ( 8)
- RE: Sounds that cannot be heard? - navman 11:02:47 03/24/09 ( 0)
- RE: Sounds that cannot be heard? - MC-SACDs 10:44:52 03/24/09 ( 6)
- what a bunch of hokum - tunenut 11:30:21 03/25/09 ( 0)
- Tests? - Tony Lauck 12:15:15 03/24/09 ( 1)
- RE: Tests? - MC-SACDs 13:17:44 03/24/09 ( 0)
- So in essence - navman 11:11:56 03/24/09 ( 2)
- you are truly mad man, you need a help..... - MC-SACDs 11:21:37 03/24/09 ( 1)
- LOL - navman 12:52:06 03/24/09 ( 0)
Unregistered Troll/sockpuppet - your opinion is immaterial. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:35:06 03/24/09 ( 0)
RE: wasted effort, I gave up trying to teach Navman anything, especially ultrasonic theory. - navman 08:13:19 03/24/09 ( 1)
- I'm speaking of years back, this is all a rerun but you have more SACD lovers to attack this time. - Teresa 15:50:30 03/24/09 ( 0)
RE: wasted effort, I gave up trying to teach Navman anything, especially ultrasonic theory. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 17:35:21 03/23/09 ( 2)
- RE: wasted effort, I gave up trying to teach Navman anything, especially ultrasonic theory. - MC-SACDs 07:02:37 03/24/09 ( 1)
- RE: LOL - navman 08:49:30 03/24/09 ( 0)
Great post and great analogy! (;-) nt - Teresa 18:08:33 03/19/09 ( 0)
When Teresa reads this, TAKE COVER - INCOMING!!!!! [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:39:07 03/19/09 ( 7)
- I didn't respond to TommyTunes post as you predicted as I have no problem with anyone enjoying CDs, - Teresa 18:23:44 03/20/09 ( 1)
- RE: I didn't respond to TommyTunes post as you predicted as I have no problem with anyone enjoying CDs, - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 17:52:12 03/24/09 ( 0)
You should put out stock market tips.. - tunenut 17:57:24 03/20/09 ( 2)
- He didn't call it, as I didn't respond to TommyTunes post but jumped in to defend MC-SACDs against the trolls - Teresa 19:35:19 03/20/09 ( 1)
- he called it! - tunenut 19:45:52 03/20/09 ( 0)
RE: LOL and Hiro resurfaced - navman 10:51:56 03/20/09 ( 0)
LOL - TommyTunes 16:53:15 03/19/09 ( 0)