Home
AudioAsylum Trader
General Asylum: RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? by neolith

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping?

174.81.71.248


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread:  [ Display   All   Email ] [ General Asylum ]
[ Alert Moderator ]

A PLLXO can work wonders - it presents a non-varying impedance load to the preamp eliminating the need for Zobels and other tricks of the trade, and provides all the power benefits of line-level biamping. However there are some major drawbacks: 1) the crossover frequencies are dependent on the input and output impedances - change the amp or preamp and the PLLXO needs to be redesigned; 2) for practical reasons, the XO is limited to first-order which may not work with all drivers; 3) the insertion losses of the bass and treble filters need to be matched to the amplifiers so the overall gain of the both sections are the same - doable but must be designed and may limit one to using identical amps; 4) like all crossovers the crossover frequencies need to be designed for the specific speaker. Basically all these issues means that off-the-shelf modules are likely to be a disappointment. If you are serious about a PLLXO, then some electronics knowledge is needed to get it right. One other issue, if one goes to a line-level XO (active or passive), the speaker-level crossover needs to be disconnected and likely an extra set of input jacks added to the speaker. This requires some basic soldering skills and may effect the re-sale value of the speakers.
BTW, biamping at the speaker level is of limited value and IMO is not worth the cost of a second amp and cables.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Analog Engineering Associates  



Topic - Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - thump 17:37:25 07/17/19 ( 39)