|
General Asylum: RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? by rlindsa General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
98.242.217.229
In Reply to: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? posted by Jonesy on September 28, 2017 at 11:09:29:
Maybe. But even if you can isolate the "difference" to the component you swapped out/in - can you tell if the difference is "better" or "worse" for a given listener?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - Jonesy 11:09:29 09/28/17 ( 39)
- RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - Inmate51 16:31:09 09/29/17 ( 1)
- RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - Jonesy 17:32:30 09/29/17 ( 0)
In the case of your suggestion... - E-Stat 14:08:36 09/29/17 ( 6)
- Wish it was that easy - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 06:54:10 09/30/17 ( 0)
LOL!!! So we've come no further than... - Jonesy 14:48:45 09/29/17 ( 4)
- We've come no further than - E-Stat 17:29:56 09/29/17 ( 3)
- I'm 15 minutes away from listening to... - Jonesy 17:37:26 09/29/17 ( 2)
- My first recalibration of how well an audio system could sound - E-Stat 17:57:59 09/29/17 ( 1)
- RE: My first recalibration of how well an audio system could sound - Jonesy 18:35:40 09/29/17 ( 0)
RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - rlindsa 09/29/17 08:53:18 09/29/17 ( 1)
- RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - Jonesy 09:13:27 09/29/17 ( 0)
RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - PAR 15:38:47 09/28/17 ( 1)
- RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - Jonesy 09:16:35 09/29/17 ( 0)
People have been using recordings... - mkuller 15:06:16 09/28/17 ( 6)
- RE: People have been using recordings... - Jonesy 09:27:09 09/29/17 ( 5)
- If you refer to the interview years ago in TAS... - E-Stat 14:04:39 09/29/17 ( 4)
- in TAS...or stereophile? - hifitommy 16:29:42 09/29/17 ( 2)
- There may be both, but - E-Stat 17:22:43 09/29/17 ( 1)
- but i didn't see ... - hifitommy 17:51:04 09/29/17 ( 0)
- Yes! That's the one! - Jonesy 14:52:54 09/29/17 ( 0)
I think this will be difficult - Dave_K 13:21:55 09/28/17 ( 1)
- I see that it would be extremely difficult. - Jonesy 16:54:27 09/28/17 ( 0)
I think if the microphone and record equipment was of the best quality.. yeah.. - 3+4=5 11:37:47 09/28/17 ( 10)
- RE: I think if the microphone and record equipment was of the best quality.. yeah.. - Jonesy 09:29:50 09/29/17 ( 2)
- "Maybe we can revisit this in a few hundred years, if ever" - axolotl 10:04:17 09/29/17 ( 1)
- LOL!!! I should have said Maybe "someone" can... - Jonesy 10:23:44 09/29/17 ( 0)
RE: I think if the microphone and record equipment was of the best quality.. yeah.. - Tweaker456 12:11:23 09/28/17 ( 6)
- I find that to be an oversimplification as.... - viridian 14:41:41 09/28/17 ( 5)
- When one reads so many posts about choosing due to some theory the person has 'glommed' onto.. - 3+4=5 15:15:50 09/28/17 ( 3)
- I don't believe that there is a "correct technically" sound... - viridian 15:27:15 09/28/17 ( 2)
- RE: I don't believe that there is a "correct technically" sound... - Tweaker456 08:59:09 09/29/17 ( 1)
- Absolutely, which one is more "correct technically"? nt - viridian 11:43:20 09/29/17 ( 0)
- Not only distortion spectra... - mkuller 15:09:49 09/28/17 ( 0)
RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - 6bq5 11:35:26 09/28/17 ( 5)
- Of course audible differences are objectively measurable - Analog Scott 20:27:26 10/2/17 ( 0)
RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - Todd Krieger 23:30:33 09/28/17 ( 3)
- RE: Why isn't science used for objective comparisons? - 6bq5 13:20:09 09/29/17 ( 0)
Actually... not. - Bill Way 11:30:24 09/29/17 ( 0)
Hmmm. Interesting point! (nt) - Jonesy 09:31:20 09/29/17 ( 0)