|
Classical Court: Nope... by kuma From Perotin to Prokofiev (and beyond), performed by Caruso to Khatia, it's all here. |
For Sale Ads |
108.223.234.63
In Reply to: If they happened to have found the first movement of Bruckner 6... posted by John N on March 19, 2019 at 15:03:46:
According to the list, it only list from mv.2-4. only.
What am mostly curious about is the Bruckner No.9. This was released by DG in mono back then. I checked the recording date and says Dec. 7 1944
and the new set, its recording date is Dec. 3-7.
DG pressing sounds dire. but if the recording date is the same, there isn't much improvement to be had. But DG might have used an air check quality copy. They say that this is *newly discovered* but love to know from those who purchased the set how much better is it, really?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Anyone ordered the new Berliner/Furtwangler SACD set? - kuma 13:42:59 03/18/19 ( 8)
- I can ask my girlfriend if she has bought it... - John Marks 16:09:54 03/22/19 ( 2)
- I have that Harnoncourt/BPO Schubert box too (CD/blu-ray-audio incarnation) - I really like it too! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 00:22:46 03/23/19 ( 0)
- Let us know if she got to listen to the Bruckner 9.... - kuma 21:33:37 03/22/19 ( 0)
If they happened to have found the first movement of Bruckner 6... - John N 15:03:46 03/19/19 ( 2)
- Nope... - kuma 03/19/19 19:01:52 03/19/19 ( 0)
RE: Anton Bruckner Symphony No. 6 (incomplete).. - Ivan303 18:49:46 03/19/19 ( 0)
Out of my price range - jimbill 11:05:02 03/19/19 ( 1)
- Me too. it's a bit steep if they were duds. (nt) - kuma 12:11:16 03/19/19 ( 0)