|
Cable Asylum: RE: x 128 i.e. 96k sample rate uses 12.288 MHz [nt] by antoneb Interconnects, speaker wire, power cords. Ask the Cable Guys. |
For Sale Ads |
12.43.56.241
In Reply to: x 128 i.e. 96k sample rate uses 12.288 MHz [nt] posted by Ted Smith on October 28, 2010 at 12:03:17:
Cool
What is the 128?
I'm interested in knowing how that scales?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Ideal length for digital cable? - mashley 17:28:07 10/16/10 ( 19)
- Forgive them Lord, for they know not what they say - Brian A 21:17:39 11/1/10 ( 2)
- You are correct with one exception. - Ted Smith 13:22:14 11/2/10 ( 1)
- Nice response - Brian A 14:31:01 11/2/10 ( 0)
RE: Ideal length for digital cable? - Not Yet There 11:33:28 10/28/10 ( 1)
- LMAO!!! nt - mashley 14:49:38 10/28/10 ( 0)
The notion is 1.5 meter, not 15 foot. (nt) - Duster 14:49:21 10/18/10 ( 0)
Ideal? No idea. Optimal? 1.5 meters - John Marks 06:49:31 10/18/10 ( 3)
- Do Bees really have knees? - Jack G 15:57:57 10/18/10 ( 2)
asked a similar question - Joe Murphy Jr 23:20:55 10/17/10 ( 5)
- RE: asked a similar question - antoneb 14:56:53 10/18/10 ( 4)
- RE: asked a similar question - antoneb 15:01:34 10/18/10 ( 3)
- x 128 i.e. 96k sample rate uses 12.288 MHz [nt] - Ted Smith 12:03:17 10/28/10 ( 2)
- RE: x 128 i.e. 96k sample rate uses 12.288 MHz [nt] - antoneb 10/28/10 12:47:21 10/28/10 ( 1)
- RE: x 128 i.e. 96k sample rate uses 12.288 MHz [nt] - Ted Smith 12:56:49 10/28/10 ( 0)
RE: Ideal length for digital cable? - TRUFI 17:34:55 10/17/10 ( 0)
RE: Ideal length for digital cable? - antoneb 13:40:00 10/17/10 ( 1)
- RE: Ideal length for digital cable? - antoneb 18:36:46 10/17/10 ( 0)