 
|
General Asylum: Re: Stereophile 2004 Buyer's Guide by KKM General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
General Asylum: Re: Stereophile 2004 Buyer's Guide by KKM General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
63.151.181.253
In Reply to: Stereophile 2004 Buyer's Guide posted by Neil49 on November 18, 2003 at 19:18:21:
They're missing quite a few co's, like Marsh and also the issue is very hard to read because the specs extend to the next page. To be fair S&V is also missing some co.'s like Sound Lab but they are a lot easier to read.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Stereophile 2004 Buyer's Guide - Neil49 19:18:21 11/18/03 ( 37)
- Re: Stereophile 2004 Buyer's Guide - KKM 11/19/03 12:37:32 11/19/03 ( 0)
In response to the posts below - Neil49 12:27:52 11/19/03 ( 1)
- Points well put. - FCH 22:04:17 11/20/03 ( 0)
My take on it.. give them a break it's their first time at this. - Gordon Rankin 08:11:52 11/19/03 ( 2)
- Re: My take on it.. give them a break it's their first time at this. - suits_me 06:36:33 11/20/03 ( 0)
I like my take better-more sensational - beach cruiser 06:09:41 11/20/03 ( 0)
They probably published info as provided by the manufacturers themselves. nt - Budrew 07:37:17 11/19/03 ( 0)
Re: Stereophile 2004 Buyer's Guide - Greg Cz 02:59:55 11/19/03 ( 0)
Read 50% of the November issue while waiting for my wife... - DeKay 21:39:00 11/18/03 ( 26)
- A Joke of a mag? - NEAR SOTA 09:36:35 11/20/03 ( 0)
I don't really understand why everyone bashes Stereophile magazine... - uw312@aol.com 09:32:06 11/19/03 ( 8)
- another side of hi fi is available - beach cruiser 06:56:17 11/20/03 ( 0)
It shouldn't be necessary to read between the lines - Todd B. 22:09:21 11/19/03 ( 2)
- You are so naive - nt - theaudiohobby 11:49:28 11/20/03 ( 1)
- About what? - Todd B. 23:55:08 11/20/03 ( 0)
alternate magazine... - revjac 13:10:54 11/19/03 ( 0)
Re: I don't really understand why everyone bashes Stereophile magazine... - Plasmatronic 11:54:59 11/19/03 ( 0)
UW: I did not note "always positive" style in the couple of... - DeKay 11:37:06 11/19/03 ( 0)
Re: I don't really understand why everyone bashes Stereophile magazine... - mdl 10:10:32 11/19/03 ( 0)
"An analog guru who most likely has but a year's experience with such" - Rob Doorack 06:48:23 11/19/03 ( 14)
- Not embarassed @ all Rob, though I may have Michael... - DeKay 10:54:21 11/19/03 ( 3)
- Michael Fremer - RichardG 16:47:57 11/19/03 ( 0)
- Re: Michael Fremer - Rob Doorack 11:07:06 11/19/03 ( 1)
- Friends of ours have a subscription... - DeKay 12:10:53 11/19/03 ( 0)
LOL! Way to set the record (pun) straight. And... - Bosh 09:13:08 11/19/03 ( 9)
- Re: LOL! Way to set the record (pun) straight. And... - Rob Doorack 13:00:22 11/19/03 ( 8)
- In other words....... - Ubiquitous Skittercat ;,,,~ 18:19:37 11/19/03 ( 6)
- Lame ... - Stephæn 16:20:32 11/20/03 ( 1)
- I don't think that was an effective insult at all - suits_me 06:43:38 11/20/03 ( 0)
- "ubiquitous cat litter" is it? - Bruce from DC 21:09:09 11/19/03 ( 1)
You're wrong. I turned down one proffer (nt) - Rob Doorack 19:46:20 11/19/03 ( 0)
Re: In other words....... - Rod M 19:02:45 11/19/03 ( 1)
- Re: In other words....... - Joe II-V 23:39:07 11/21/03 ( 0)
Understood. - Bosh 16:15:35 11/19/03 ( 0)
Not defending Stereophile, but... - Vic G 04:13:01 11/19/03 ( 0)
Remember, it's only what they consider "hi-end". Screw 'em. - Tromatic 20:01:30 11/18/03 ( 0)
[Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
