Vinyl Asylum

Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Shure V15VxMR Intermodulation Distortion Measurements

Posted by John Elison on May 24, 2004 at 10:20:46:
The following graphs show how the Shure V15VxMR performs on intermodulation tests with a +12-dB test tone modulating a low-level 3,945-Hz test tone. Actually, the low-level test tone was supposed to be 4,000-Hz, but the manufacturerâ€™s test tone generator must have been running a little slow. My turntable speed was right on target.
Those of you who own the Hi-Fi News test record will understand the significance of a +12-dB test tone. It is the same level as the first bias setting test tone, Band 6, Side 1. The only difference is the frequencyâ€”300-Hz on the Hi-Fi News test record compared to 200-Hz for this intermodulation test.
When intermodulation distortion occurs from modulating a low-level high frequency signal with a loud-level bass frequency, intermodulation side-bands form around the high frequency signal showing the distortion. The frequency of the side bands will be multiples of the low frequency signal added and subtracted to the high frequency signal. In contrast to harmonic distortion, intermodulation distortion is non-euphonic because the side bands are almost never harmonically related to the modulated signal.
Okay, harmonic distortion, especially 2nd harmonic distortion, is considered to be euphonic because it is harmonically related to the music. In fact, there have been listening tests conducted in which participants actually preferred the addition of anywhere from 2% to 5% 2nd harmonic distortion, depending on the type of music. On the other hand, intermodulation distortion is very undesirable and even small amounts of it tend to detract from oneâ€™s musical enjoyment.
This brings me to my latest theory regarding the sonic differences between MM cartridges and low-output MC cartridges. I have a theory that MC cartridges sound better because they produce more of the euphonic types of distortion and less of the non-euphonic types. From the measurements Iâ€™ve completed thus far, the Dynavector DRT XV-1 produces more than twice the harmonic distortion as the Shure V15VxMR, which is consistent with my theory. Now, if only the intermodulation tests would show the reverse, my theory might be valid. Unfortunately, I have not yet measured the Dynavector for intermodulation distortion. That will be my next project, which is to reinstall the Dynavector and conduct intermodulation measurements.
The excessively high levels of intermodulation distortion with a vertically modulated groove are rather disturbing and perplexing. Weâ€™re talking about almost 100% intermodulation distortion. I am very curious to find out what the Dynavector does on these tests.
Best regards,
John Elison