Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Vinyl Asylum

Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Justifications for remixing the album

Posted by radiodaddy on June 12, 2017 at 21:38:15:

The most frequently quoted reason for remixing the album is that the band did not have a hand in the original stereo mix - it was left to George Martin and EMI's studio engineers. This version likewise was not mixed with the input of the band (half of which being deceased). The original was at least prepared by people (producer and engineers) who worked with the group day in and day out, including on the recording of the record, and would presumably have had some insight into their audio thought processes.

Likewise, Giles Martin and Sam Okell have been quoted as saying the new mix was created to capture the sound and feel of the mono mix. If that's the case, why bother? It's not like fifty years ago, when stereo was still a relative novelty, hyped as a massive improvement over supposedly outmoded single-channel recording. A stellar restoration of the mono version was created just a few years ago and is available, as the marketers say, in all formats...

...which suggests the real reason for the newly-minted mix. As the fiftieth anniversary of the album approached, the mavens at EMI (now Universal) realized they'd shot their wad by creating and massively promoting "definitive" stereo and mono versions of the commercial and artistic gem of the catalogue a few years earlier. Another collection of outtakes and false starts would have been greeted with yawns and presumably tepid sales, so - voila! - an even more definitive version of the stereo mix. This, despite the fact that no one can really say there's anything particularly inept, objectionable, or incompetent about the original stereo mix beloved by millions for the past five decades.

FWIW, I bought the box solely to get the 5.1 mix - if they'd issued it separately, I'd have opted for that, as I already have original stereo (Parlophone) and mono (Capitol) issues of the record. The surround version is nicely done (the crescendos in "A Day in the Life" are especially cool), though it's a puzzle why it wasn't done say, fifteen years ago, when DVD-A and SACD were the flavors of the moment. It's a nice curiosity, certainly not an essential, but a nifty little change of pace. I agree with John Lennon on this - the mono is the best.