Tweakers' Asylum

Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

What's next?

Posted by Dave I on July 24, 2000 at 22:50:16:
I don't know Mike. That is kind of up to you. I don't know anything about your processor other than it uses the CS8414. What kind of digital input do you use, wire or Toslink? There are many methods to assure whichever one you are using is optimized to reduce jitter. But after that you would probably have to start substituting parts or redesigning circuits. Bob Fitzgerald has taken on some similar reworking of commercial DACs and some of the work was published in past issues of Audio Electronics. Many posters here believe you can make significant improvements with liberal use of highly miniaturized electrolytics so you could try that. Or you could take a different approach and ....
Dave