![]() ![]() |
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Re: To Hyperion
Posted by Hyperion on May 19, 1999 at 20:10:33:
First I have to tell you that I am no SET expert. I am a big SET fan tho - having heard several SET amps including the mighty Ongaku, but I dont own one yet. But I definitely intend to own one before I am 40 hehehe!
1. I've heard several DIY 2A3 amps only, no commercial ones yet, and my impression of em is that the 2A3 triode sound a bit darkish, romantic, more psychedelic, but less detailed, less open and less gutsy than 300Bs. There is an inherent grace and lack of aggression and spunk in the tubes, so I dont think they are the proper tubes for rock! I havent heard the Soliloquys so I cannot comment about those. One thing is sure tho, when and if I roll my own 2A3 amp, I'll definitely wanna use a 97+ dB/w/m speaker with em. :-)
2. 2A3 and 300B dont sound alike, its like EL34 vs 6550. It is so easy to say that one is better than the other but it is not THAT cut n dried in practice. One is indeed inherently more musical, but the other one is inherently more detailed and more dynamic. The solution? You simply got to have both of em. :-)
3. Most low power SETs tend to work well with passives since they have high input sensitivity (er less voltage input needed to output maximum power). I have not verified this, but some say the higher powered SET with 845 or 211 tubes are not as passive-friendly tho.
4. I still havent found one. Simple, point-to-point, 1-2 gain stage hardwired active designs like the Electronic Tonalities, Wright Sound etc designs pique my interest tho ...